There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:DDT
You know guys, there's a thing called a talk page, that might be a place to say, talk about the article. steriletalk 02:22, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Delete all you like[edit]
It doesn't mean you're right. Are you really going to let all that uncited shit on DDT stand? It might be right. I don't know. But if you cunts are hosting that article, the least you can do is find some fucking references for the facts you're claiming. 85.210.6.10 (talk) 03:10, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
- Fuck me fuck you big boy. C6541 (T↔C) 04:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- What is it with today?--Revolverman (talk) 04:34, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- At least this one's from November. Peter Subsisting on honey 05:14, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- What is it with today?--Revolverman (talk) 04:34, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- Incorporating the external links into the article as references would probably be a good start.--"Shut up, Brx." 04:46, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Deniers list[edit]
Is the DDT deniers section for pundits who claim there's no negative side effects to DDT or for wingnuts who think DDT agricultural bans lead to mass murder?ClothCoat (talk) 21:55, 29 June 2013 (UTC)Clothcoat
- I was just going to ask that. Some explanation of what these people say about DDT is needed. Bicyclewheel
17:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Recent swath of removal by Jinx[edit]
At a glance, I don't really support removing all that information and then rewriting an entirely new statement with Daily Beast as the only source. May I see an explanation for that edit? Curious. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 20:45, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
- I waited for a bit and after that, I had to revert. Mind, I don't dispute the new information, but rather the removal of old information and all the sources with it and replacing it with a piece by Paul Offit. Now, I know who Offit is, a pro vaxxer who invented the rotavirus vaccine. But I would like to see a refutation of those claims in the article rather than outright replacement. I also don't think banning DDT is all bad, but changing tone to ban bad, Rachel Carson bad, isn't a good edit to the article. --It's-a me,
LeftyGreenMario! 19:34, 26 December 2018 (UTC)