Talk:DDT

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

You know guys, there's a thing called a talk page, that might be a place to say, talk about the article. steriletalk 02:22, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Delete all you like[edit]

It doesn't mean you're right. Are you really going to let all that uncited shit on DDT stand? It might be right. I don't know. But if you cunts are hosting that article, the least you can do is find some fucking references for the facts you're claiming. 85.210.6.10 (talk) 03:10, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Fuck me fuck you big boy. C6541 (TC) 04:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
What is it with today?--Revolverman (talk) 04:34, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
At least this one's from November. Peter Subsisting on honey 05:14, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Incorporating the external links into the article as references would probably be a good start.--"Shut up, Brx." 04:46, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Deniers list[edit]

Is the DDT deniers section for pundits who claim there's no negative side effects to DDT or for wingnuts who think DDT agricultural bans lead to mass murder?ClothCoat (talk) 21:55, 29 June 2013 (UTC)Clothcoat

I was just going to ask that. Some explanation of what these people say about DDT is needed. BicyclewheelModerator 17:19, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
For that matter, the article doesn't really say anything about what actually is bad about DDT... RychschaX (talk) 14:55, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Recent swath of removal by Jinx[edit]

At a glance, I don't really support removing all that information and then rewriting an entirely new statement with Daily Beast as the only source. May I see an explanation for that edit? Curious. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario!(Mod) 20:45, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

I waited for a bit and after that, I had to revert. Mind, I don't dispute the new information, but rather the removal of old information and all the sources with it and replacing it with a piece by Paul Offit. Now, I know who Offit is, a pro vaxxer who invented the rotavirus vaccine. But I would like to see a refutation of those claims in the article rather than outright replacement. I also don't think banning DDT is all bad, but changing tone to ban bad, Rachel Carson bad, isn't a good edit to the article. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario!(Mod) 19:34, 26 December 2018 (UTC)