RationalWiki's 2018 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3630Goal: $5000

Talk:Deepak Chopra

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon new age.svg

This New Age related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Copperbrain.png
Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

This page is automatically archived by Archivist
Archives for this talk page: <1>

fucking hilarious- thumbs up![edit]

Chopra sells something called ayurvedic medicine, which is apparently traditional Indian medicine filtered through the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi and mixed with bad physics in order to treat dangerously low levels of money in Chopra's wallet.

Edit summaries are not the talk page.[edit]

Could you two having an edit war out there in mainspace make it more clear what your dispute is, please? ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 18:39, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

I'm not disputing anything. I'm being obedient to the dictates. And then enforcing them.
Why, yes, I am grudgily irritated. Why do you ask? ;) --Castaigne (talk) 18:42, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Castaigne, the joke was bad; I removed it. The rest of the humor was fine and underscored our points. FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk) 18:45, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
You always think the jokes are bad. And then you create a bunch of one sentence paragraphs. --Castaigne (talk) 18:49, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
There's like 50 other jokes in the article that are funny. ><_><
Yeah, I do. FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk) 18:54, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
A paragraph should be, grammatically speaking, a minimum of three sentences.
And I have determined, in light of your view of funny, that everything else is unfunny. Thus, removed. --Castaigne (talk) 18:57, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
omfg NOBODY WANTS HUMORLESS RATIONALWIKI. stop passive-aggressively removing the funny shit just cuz I pissed you off ʇυzzγɔɒтqoтɒтo (talk/stalk) 18:59, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Passive-aggressive nothing. I make sure I do things in the most blatant method possible. Now be a good potato and be obedient. --Castaigne (talk) 19:05, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Rainbow trout transparent.png Whack!
You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. FuzzyCatPotato just wants to let you know you did something silly.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! TROUT! VICTORY IS MINE!
OK, grudge over. Oh, someone has reverted it back already. Well, never mind. --Castaigne (talk) 19:08, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

added warning[edit]

This has gotten ridiculous ive added an edit warring warning Bubba41102Taste the shortness 19:09, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Goddammit, that was not what I meant to do.
-manually edits-
Better. See above conversation. --Castaigne (talk) 19:11, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Rainbow trout transparent.png Whack!
You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Bubba41102 just wants to let you know you did something silly.

Well im sorry that i saw you deleting 2000 bits of data, didnt see that. Bubba41102Taste the shortness 19:16, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
I also wanted an excuse to use the trout. Bubba41102Taste the shortness 19:16, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

The dunning-kruger effect in full swing[edit]

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2017/03/21/deepak-chopra-speculates-trumps-brain/99452268/ Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:11, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Followup on ISHAR[edit]

Seems it was basically a flop. FuzzyCatPotato!™ (talk/stalk) 20:00, 18 July 2017 (UTC)