Talk:Element

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Really? And we need or want this, why? --Green mowse.pngGodot 16:11, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

^--il'Dictator Mikal 16:12, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
It was an improvement over the redirect, I suppose, as the category page was turning into an article. Scarlet A.pnggnostic 16:15, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
This is the kind of thing we should just direct to WP for, unless we can find some woo related to elements. Cow...Hammertime! 16:16, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Fully agree. Aresinc, for example, I'd keep when focused on NASA and new life, cause that is critical to our mission. Showing not only that life might evolve, but how the Scientific Method works, when someone does/says something not so "correct". But just a list of elements and some basic descriptions seems to be way off into "recreate wiki" land.--Green mowse.pngGodot 16:18, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
If my head wasn't all the fuzzy-fuzzy right now I'm sure I could find missionality trivia on most of them. Scarlet A.pnggnostic 16:24, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Could some strapping fellow mark this for deletion[edit]

...Or expand it? That'd be great. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 10:59, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Really though[edit]

Time to delete this thing. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 23:44, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Classical elements[edit]

Do we have a page for pre-scientific or fantasy usesWikipedia of the term "element", e.g. fire, water, air, and earth (sometimes expanded to include electricity, light, darkness, metal, wood, ice, etc.)? If not, should that get its own page or be included in this one? --Luigifan18 (talk) 17:24, 29 April 2024 (UTC)