There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Eurabia/Archive1
Article not rational[edit]
Article claims that Eurabia is a "conspiracy theory" and "PIDOOMA." The statistics for fertility rate and annual immigration number can be found on any European government website. See also: math.KingtheKing (talk) 02:20, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Agreed. RationalWiki is not rational. The editing is biased with total disregard of facts. RationalWiki holds that whatever is not in its political line is a "conspiracy theory". Yohananw (talk) 23:52, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
- ok.--"Paravant" Talk & Contribs 00:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Seems someone forgot to read the "Evidence" section. 142.124.55.236 (talk) 00:04, 3 September 42015 AQD (UTC)
- Don't feed two year old trolls Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 11:24, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Unwarranted revert[edit]
I expanded the article and added links and sources. It was reverted without explanation. It is impossible to discuss every edit on the talk page, no wiki works like that. I did change the tone of the article to make it more factual, fun is not a substitute for facts, and I assume users do want some information from RW articles.
Still needs editing to add some names - Bruce Bawer, Theodore Dalrymple, Oriana Fallaci, Serge Trifkovic, Daniel Pipes, Mark Steyn, Robert Spencer. Drelane (talk) 10:37, 27 October 2013 (UTC)