- You might want to make sure that this article remains consistent with our article Scientific theory. :-) --Bobbing up 15:38, 18 July 2008 (EDT)
Shall we need a little note saying falsifiability is not the same as fakeability? I personally think it could be useful, because in Romance languages like French or Spanish, "falsificabilité" / "falsificabiildad" means "fakeability", and the cognate might be confusing for native speakers of these languages. Just saying :3 -- 126.96.36.199 (talk) 02:10, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ does not endorse this website because there is nothing in the Holy Bible that says he does
- I assume you picked this random location to make that comment because recent changes has no talk page? ħuman 02:31, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Bad choice of term.
Why is falsifiability called what it is? I have had several occasions (including with myself) where the underlying point behind the term was lost because like the above user said falsifiability sounds like 'fakeability'. Why can't it be something a term that non-scientists could understand like 'Disprovability' or something? - Lago 9:59 AM, 27AUG10 (CST)
- Blame Popper. I'm not a personal fan of his opinions because I don't hold falsifiability as the absolute-be-all-and-end-all of science. But if people confuse it with "fakability" that's probably their problem misunderstanding the concept behind the word, rather than a problem with the term itself. d hominem 17:47, 27 August 2010 (UTC)