Talk:Fluoride stare

Merge with Water fluoridation

I think that the contents of this article would be brilliant sub-section to the current Water fluoridation article. Merge plox. Anyone else agree we should mark these for merger as duplicate? Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:00, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Works for me! I wasn't quite sure where it should land but it was so unbelievably silly it needed recognition. Like the chemtrail idiots spraying vinegar into the air to dissipate them...and back into their own eyes. Every day. -EmeraldCityWanderer (talk) 20:04, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

I think it should remain separate. It's a rhetorical tactic, rather than an argument about whether fluoridation is good or bad. FU22YC47P07470 (talk/stalk) 20:21, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

*Inaudibly protests a non-merger* Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

*Audibly prefers the status quo* Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 22:29, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Bongolian supports a merger! That makes three to one so far, my dearest feline friend and ally. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 10:42, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

What's the syndrome where you think everybody has the same voice? 86.191.125.244 (talk) 22:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

You mean, Auto-tune? Reverend Black Percy (talk) 22:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

A medical syndrome, and 'a recent cinema film' (which I did not see). Perhaps influenced by Invasion of the Body Snatchers/Stepford Wives? 86.191.125.244 (talk) 22:42, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Invasion of the body snatchers is hardly "recent cinema", though... Reverend Black Percy (talk) 23:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Can reference to Fluorite/Fluorescence be made (to confuse the claimants)? 31.51.113.88 (talk) 22:34, 22 June 2017 (UTC)