Talk:Hybrid

Yo User:Summa Atheologica, what was objectionable about the addition I made? --85.76.133.56 (talk) 19:06, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

The material wasn't even remotely missional and dealt with a subject we don't have an article on. Disambiguation pages are meant to remove ambiguity.𝔖𝔲𝔪𝔪𝔞 𝔄𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔬𝔩𝔬𝔤𝔦𝔠𝔞 (𝔮𝔲𝔢𝔯𝔢𝔩𝔦𝔰) (𝔰𝔠𝔯𝔦𝔭𝔱𝔲𝔯𝔞) 19:09, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

The two others don't have articles either? edit: okay, hybrid cars have --85.76.133.56 (talk) 19:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Yes, but they tie into significant concepts in our articles on those subjects, and have good linking to significant articles.𝔖𝔲𝔪𝔪𝔞 𝔄𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔬𝔩𝔬𝔤𝔦𝔠𝔞 (𝔮𝔲𝔢𝔯𝔢𝔩𝔦𝔰) (𝔰𝔠𝔯𝔦𝔭𝔱𝔲𝔯𝔞) 19:26, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Hmm... would it be acceptable to put up a draft for "hybrid threat"? One might be able to make it look at least presentable. I actually already found what looks like a fairly good source to use.

Granted, the term may be too nebulous to cover (and I'm not exactly sure what RW might think of what Wikipedia calls original research on a topic like this), so separate articles of what it consists of may be better. --85.76.133.56 (talk) 19:52, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Such an article would be hopelessly off-mission.𝔖𝔲𝔪𝔪𝔞 𝔄𝔱𝔥𝔢𝔬𝔩𝔬𝔤𝔦𝔠𝔞 (𝔮𝔲𝔢𝔯𝔢𝔩𝔦𝔰) (𝔰𝔠𝔯𝔦𝔭𝔱𝔲𝔯𝔞) 20:00, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Fuck. Well, I guess that's that then, I'll resume my usual routine. --85.76.133.56 (talk) 20:02, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

I don't see how those edits are off mission. We cover war, propaganda, and crime. This is within reasonable bounds of missionality. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 20:11, 26 May 2020 (UTC)