Talk:Incels.co

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Consider this talk page a honeypot for incels.co alts and alts of mods/admins there[edit]

so yea Neiltyson1fan (talk) 05:45, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Developing info[edit]

Sanctionedsuicide.com, owned by incels.co, may have been dropped by Epik, the most lenient domain registrar

according to a series of tweets

https://twitter.com/fixthe26/status/1360381225605677057

seemingly today or yesterday. their new site is sanctioned-suicide.org 14:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

https://twitter.com/fixthe26/status/1359708716740804610 Neiltyson1fan (talk) 14:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Content[edit]

This article is largely online feuding/drama, with a side of missional content. As such, I'm moving it back to draftspace. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 17:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

It's missional on every component with many citations, making it higher quality than 80% of articles currently, and those who contributed to it probably agree, moving it back Neiltyson1fan (talk) 17:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Also note we have a love-shy.com page, (a dead forum) your priorities are misplaced at best Neiltyson1fan (talk) 17:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
What parts are missional? The first section is fucking Reddit drama for fuck's sake! The wiki isn't here for your inter-forum feuds. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 17:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
It criticizes authoritarian attitudes, ranks, media coverage, misogyny, and whitewashing of above, it meets more criteria than love-shy.com Neiltyson1fan (talk) 17:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
(edit conflict) I agree with GC. Also, on the whole, can I just point out Neil takes this stuff way to personally?-Flandres (talk) 17:35, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
It's a good article, and I do not as in the incel talk page I was not the one threatening suicide, that was comradeGC Neiltyson1fan (talk) 17:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Trying to censor an article that calls out a violent forum that actually exists (unlike love-shy.com) in a very good and cited fashion should be worthy of permabans and mod investigations into the activities of such editors and their affiliations.[edit]

this article meets every component of missionality Neiltyson1fan (talk) 17:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

If they continue, similar nominations for deletion will be added to hundreds of articles that meet less missionality criteria than this one, including the non-existent forum love-shy.com Neiltyson1fan (talk) 17:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
There are also no mentions of other forums in the article, making the AFd a suspicious addition Neiltyson1fan (talk)
Now you're just asserting shit an throwing a tantrum. Demonstrate how it's missional, don't just assert that it is. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 17:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

This article[edit]

  1. critizes media on the topic
  2. calls out cranks
  3. critizes authoritarian attitudes

if you, comradeGC and flanders, don't see that, and continue to assert I throw tantrums but not those who routinely talk of self-harm in discord support chat or here when I actually go through the effort to point out missionality, is not only political, but pathetic Neiltyson1fan (talk) 17:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Yay, you've listed criteria, not demonstrated how the article meets said criteria. Also, fuck you for trying to use my emotional issues as a bludgeon against me. Also, quit spamming topic headers. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 17:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
(edit conflict) Neil, please stop getting so personal in arguments like this. It helps no one. You were not being hurt by having this article kept in draftspace a little longer. As a side note I would recommend not moving any draft into mainspace unilaterally-consult some other editors on the talk page first.-Flandres (talk) 17:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
I am fast at writing articles and i'm sorry if that bothers people, i've written 2000+ articles in the last two years, (not an exaggeration) this article has tons of citations. Neiltyson1fan (talk) 17:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
In high school i used to write articles in the bathroom 30 minutes before class and it taught me to write fast Neiltyson1fan (talk) 17:59, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Still, maybe hold your horses a little. Again, what hurts you about this being kept in draft space for a few more days? Will the world end?-Flandres (talk) 18:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
I continue being the only person not throwing personal insults or slurs, and yes I will put AFds on hundreds of artiles with less missionality if this continues Neiltyson1fan (talk) 18:01, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
And we'll vote on them on a case by case basis. Regardless, threatening to burn the metaphorical house down if you don't get your way seems a bit childish don't you think? ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 18:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
It's not exactly a closed secret most articles on RW have less missionality than this one Neiltyson1fan (talk) 18:06, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Perhaps, though it seems more likely that you're just being overly protective of an article. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 18:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
To the contrary you are being overprotective about incels.me/incels.co/r/incels/sanctionedsuicide.com Neiltyson1fan (talk) 18:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
What the fuck is that? ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 18:11, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Also this whole voting thing is bullshit, I was told in mod noticeboard socks were allowed, voting is dumb here, it's jsut for people with the most socks Neiltyson1fan (talk) 18:08, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
So you're just assuming Bad Faith by default? This explains quite a bit of your behavior... ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 18:13, 13 February 2021 (UTC)