There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Jihad/Archive1
Can I copy from this page[edit]
I need to steal this page for my website: http://www.thereligionofpeace.vacau.com/
- Read the terms of the license: [1]; "yes, but". sterilesporadic heavy hitter 15:49, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
Nonsense Political Correctness[edit]
The people of this website will not flinch to attack the Catholic church and "Conservapedia", but when it comes to Islamism (a far-right religious political movement, ironically), they bend over backwards to be politically correct, like the moronic leftists they are. Rational Wiki, more like Sharia Wiki — Unsigned, by: 5.64.228.157 / talk / contribs
- "But I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki!" Drink! Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 18:32, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Well... this isn't a very thorough article, admittedly. But I find it odd how, out of all our articles on Islamic extremism, you take this one as representative. Balaam (talk) 20:02, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- To become a far left mouthpiece that appeases everything the right decries defeats the whole purpose of this site. It's anti-science anti-reason and anti-intelligence. 207.81.189.133 (talk)
- Yep, I agree, which is why we just document things like how the concept of jihad is used completely inaccurately in right wing media. Sorry you like a specific lie we don't reinforce. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 22:46, 15 January 2019 (UTC)