There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Ken Ham/Archive1
More we can do[edit]
I feel like there's a lot more we could do with this article; for instance, until a minute ago, it didn't even mention Ham's connection to the Creation Museum. Especially with his planned opening of the Noah's Ark Park/Attraction/whatever, this should be something more. See, for instance, Kent Hovind as an example of a decent-sized article on a creationist. ThunderkatzHo! 22:58, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
I am tempted to delete the monkey picture as well. Do we really think M. Ham is that smart? ħuman 09:11, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
Whoops[edit]
Noah's Ark Theme Park Loses $18M In Tax Breaks Unless They Hire Atheists. SophieWilder 08:02, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
Google rank[edit]
At the moment Conservapedia's article ranks higher than ours. Can we get ours higher with a bit of work? Proxima Centauri (talk) 18:31, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- At the moment, both ours and Conservapedia's appear on the 4th page of a non-personalized Google search. We've bigger issues than beating CP -- this page is likely never seen from Google at all. Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 18:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- I see ours as fifth on the first page. Additionally, we are 8th on DuckDuckGo. CP is nowhere in sight. —Kazitor, pending 21:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Nye and Ham have a second debate[edit]
Ken Ham had another debate with Bill Nye AbdulAli (talk) 01:50, 11 January 2017 (UTC)