There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Ken Johnston
It's a start, but it doesn't actually explain the relevance of this character. I can infer they're important to moon landing deniers, but not a lot else. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 17:14, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comment. It should now be clear. His niche in history is not among moon-landing deniers, but NASA haters. Ithaca8 (talk) 20:38, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
- Looks great now. FuzzyDogPotato (talk/stalk) 20:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Comparisons[edit]
Anyone see 'strange patterns' when this or this is expanded on their computer screens? (Note - images may be affected by being 405 or 625 lines analogue displays.) Anna Livia (talk) 20:48, 2 December 2020 (UTC)