Talk:Kuruc.info

Any idea why RW needs an article about the site of a party about which RW doesn't have an article? Especially one that consists mainly of a quote from said website?--ZooGuard (talk) 18:37, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Site of a party? IIRC they don't admit that openly, which is why unofficialy is used in the article. The reason why this article is mostly a quote from their about page is because it perfectly encapsulates every single racist and anti-Semitic dogwhistle and blatant hatemongering and their bizarre world-view. Kuruc.info is a blight upon the Hungarian speaking side of the internet and they have a loooong history of organising harassment campaigns and even supporting terrorist activity Typhoon (talk) 19:34, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

JOBBIK has uncountable times denied any affiliation with kuruc.info. In addition, so far noone - I repeat for the intellectually challenged - noone has provided with credible proof for the opposite. Monomanic repetition of blatant lies doesn't count as sufficiant. However, it enlightens us about methods employed by the political opponent. As for as the "Hungarian speaking side of the Internet", it is a real embarassement that someone dares to speak up in that name in above manner about the most popular news site in Hungarian language. (This significant information is somehow missing from the article...)

Sources

Before this page gets and more bloated we should actually, you know cite sources, otherwise we should scrap it en masse and start from scratch. ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 03:54, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, i know. --san (talk | contributions) 04:10, 14 May 2018 (UTC)