User talk:Typhoon

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Typhoon!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

If you are interested in contributing, please read what our articles are intended to be.

Pull up a goat and have some fun!

Any questions? Please see the help page or ask me on my talk page.

MtDPinko Scum 07:38, 30 June 2011 (UTC)


Sysop PowderSmokeAndLeather: Say something once, why say it again?.Moderator 19:23, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Maybe we should collaborate[edit]

Just a thought. брэндэн (talk) 20:54, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Doxxing Wikipedia Editors[edit]

You know who's come up on this? Reason I ask is because I am a WP editorWikipedia who has his hands in Anita and Tropes vs. Women articles. Zero (talk - contributions) 20:40, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Sent you an email. Typhoon (talk) 20:51, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Before you ask[edit]

Some troll from Wikipedia followed me here after it was broadcast all over reddit. His MO is to revert any edit I've made that he can. Fuzzy cat potato already found one and I linked to the still fairly recent sock puppet case on this tool. I hope it is not an issue that I blocked him for a custom period of time. I tried to do so in the manner of other block lengths at least.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 10:03, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

You won't get into trouble for blocking vandals. And regarding block lengths, it's standard to make it last from few days to few months. The majority of vandals don't return when their block ends, so indefinite blocks aren't necessary. Typhoon (talk) 13:39, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
So 8 digits of pi in seconds is too much?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 18:18, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Maybe for a random vandal, but since this one crawled from wikipedia and is stalking you I think the block length is just right. Typhoon (talk) 18:22, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
How many more digits of pi can we use?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 19:26, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
That depends on how obsessive the vandal is. But we don't ban permanently, unless the jerk did something horrible like doxxing or posting illegal content. Typhoon (talk) 19:39, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Well he did follow me from Wikipedia where he is the easiest to spot and came to rational wiki to do the exact same shit. Sounds pretty obsessive. Maybe he should buy me dinner first next time.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 10:26, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Tangent while I'm here though. What do you think a good use for this would be? A friend gave it to me to upload here.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 10:28, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Opening a new section[edit]

I don't feel like opening a new section. Does he still seem sane enough for you?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 08:08, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Seeing that he just unnironically used the word 'cuck'. It's obvious at this point that he's trolling. Typhoon (talk) 08:10, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Yes but I mean is he still sane.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 08:13, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Also is this too big?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 08:15, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
It's just the right size, IMHO. And no, at this point he could be replaced by a bot that randomly copypastes GG talking points. Which means he's right now failing the Turing test. Typhoon (talk) 08:21, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
When will he be ripe for coopening?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 08:23, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
When he does more than just bitch on one talkpage about cuckolding. Right now he's just releasing whining noises. Typhoon (talk) 08:29, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
But now he's being really bad at reading.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 08:54, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Then everyone should stop responding. He'll just spam more links to Ralph and ignore everything anyone says. Don't waste your time talking with someone who's a True Believer™. Typhoon (talk) 09:01, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Why was he demoted when he was an obvious mismatch for this site though?—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 09:02, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
I can't believe you of all people asked that question. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 13:37, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

RE: Surreal feeling[edit]

What about me or my name causes that? Do we know each other from somewhere? --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 17:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Oh, I didn't recognize you. "Typhoon" isn't a very distintive username, but I guess that's to your advantage. Ignore the two on my talk page; they've been at each other for nearly two years now. I only enter the fray at the right opportunities, but the other two are at it 24/7, and they're apparently watching a talk page that's barely updated. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 19:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Since you were an ED user, I owe you a heads-up[edit]

This following is an Email I received from Vordrak / Matthew Hopkins. He asked me for information on you.

Subject: Wikipedia Gamaliel and RationalWiki
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 15:17:10
Sender: "Matthew Hopkins" <redacted>
From: "Matthew Hopkins" <redacted>
To: <redacted> 


Two things. Firstly Gamaliel is now an ArbCom member, despite antics such as banning me for my articles on the Paedophiles of Wikipedia and Mark Bernstein. Methinks he warrants fresh media coverage.

Secondly, I am planning some coverage of RationalWiki. To save time, I don't suppose you have any details for RW GooniePunk and / or Typhoon?

Kind regards,

Sam Smith

writing as
Matthew Hopkins
The Witchfinder General

This likely has something to do with your revisions to the Gamergate article. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 01:49, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Oh man, I was totally right that this guy is pissed. What do you wanna do, Typhoon?Keter (talk) 02:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
I'll just continue drinking Collingwood's tears of impotent rage. Typhoon (talk) 07:53, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Feminism article[edit]

Why did you delete more than 35 KB from the article???--Arisboch ☞✍☜☞✉☜ ∈)☼(∋ 14:33, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

My mistake. I only meant to fix the source for the quote, but for some reason most of the text in the edit box didn't load, and I hit save without previewing first. Typhoon (talk) 14:43, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Were you seriously edit-warring an editor over where she wants her comment to be in a thread?[edit]

Dude, step outside for a while. Enjoy the sunshine, or the rain, or the snow. Go see Star Wars, or go to the library and find a good book to read. Any other use of your time but that. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 19:28, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Eh, to move that comment there was apparently FCP's idea. Or was FCP wrong to move it there? If so, then I'll leave it. Typhoon (talk) 19:30, 18 December 2015 (UTC)


Look, how about you leave me alone, and I'll return the favor? This wiki has no dearth of greatly annoying edit-warring and personality clashes. It doesn't need any more and I'd rather not be a party to it.---Mona- (talk) 20:27, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Adding Aneris' name to one of our articles[edit]

This feels spiteful and pointless, except to aggravate them. Fuzzy "Cat" Potato, Jr. (talk/stalk) 23:23, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

I've actually asked if it's OK to add it to it. Since it it didn't get immediately reverted, not even by Aneris himself, I assumed it's fine. After all, no one complained about being "spiteful and pointless" when we created entire articles on conservapedia members, some of which also had accounts on RW (Rob Smith, is a good example). Just like Rob is a conservapedia member, so is Aneris. And neither of them are minor members, Aneris is infamous in th atheist community.Typhoon (talk) 09:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Of course, my name is still in the fantasy article. And I was never EVERa conservapedia member, and have NO relationship to that site at all. I actually didn't even know it was a thing when I came here. Nobdoy outside of RationalWiki gives a hoot about it. Rather, it's another powerful demonstration of othering that goes to ludicrous extremes where Conservapedia somehow has to do with atheists. Likewise, the Slymepit article is a complete fantasy article. It's quite amazing what amount of lies are produced by this site. Noteworthy, Typhoon has even removed minor clarification that could be backed up with several first hand sources, such as from the Pharyngula wiki. I'm against the addition, since Typhoon uses a technique where he makes shit up in the article, then pins it to me, even though I have compelte opposite views than claimed there. This is of course a severe form of abuse, where I have not even a say in what I allegedly believe. I'm probably not as important as Typhoon makes me out to be, but let's say I have my connections, and of course I use them against you. ~ Aneris 23:31, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

You're nominated![edit]

You've got the chance for another shot at becoming a mod (a modshot?) in the upcoming by-election. ScepticWombat (talk) 05:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Ongoing edit war[edit]

i made a vote here at Talk:Hillary Clinton#Edit wars to discuss the edit war and come to a consensus. Bubba41102The place where you can scream at me 19:33, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


What would you have done? Both I and another editor reverted sandflapjack. He persisted in reverting anyway. I asked him to take it to the talk page, twice, and he reverted yet again, putting in the edit summary: "No. Talking about it over tea wont change anyone here's mind and you know it." So? ---Mona- (talk) 20:48, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

I don't have a horse in this race, but I will just point out - in the general defense of Mona and that other editor who reverted - that people who explicitly resist the talk page need to be resisted generally in turn. "No" is not a valid reply when directed to the talkpage over a controversial edit. Now, I don't know the backstory here, I don't know who did what, etc. But if the isolated scenario I just drew up in this comment and this comment only was relatable to what played out today, then this comment also contains my verdict on said events. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 21:09, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Long blockquotes[edit]

This isn't some personal attack on your edit. I really do, habitually, edit long quotes to shorten them, even at articles I don't much care about. I've done it at Gamergate articles, and did it repeatedly when Aneris stuck in looong blocks of quoted text. It's an editorial pique of mine and also seems to be the convention at this wiki not to employ such lengthy quotes. That makes sense, or else the article reduces to some outside source's writing.---Mona- (talk) 18:36, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

I'm already addressing your hypocrisy on your talk page. Keep it there. Typhoon (talk) 18:47, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

The case to get me re-sysop'd[edit]

Now that the dust has settled, I was wondering if I could make a case for you or someone to re-sysop me. The case for my demodding was questionable, and the person that I was "edit warring" with has been brought up for edit warring multiple people. I have literally not even toughed the sysop controls, let alone abuse them. They also decided to de-autopatrol me. I bring this up now because of vandals fucking with the wiki, and me being unable to do anything about it. If you can help out, gimmie a holla Sandflapjack (talk) 03:26, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Clinton's support for the Iran deal[edit]

She has said she wants to put new sanctions on Iran in order to get rid of their ballistic missle program. Even though he new sanctions wouldn't violate the deal itself the Iranians will not tolerate what appears to be a betrayal and they will pull out of the deal.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 16:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC) 16:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

"Mrs. Clinton’s speech, at the Brookings Institution, amounted to a strong endorsement of the deal struck by President Obama and her successor as secretary of state, John Kerry". No amount of spin will erase this. Typhoon (talk) 16:58, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
There is no spin. Her support for new sanctions is a detriment to such a deal.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 17:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC) 17:01, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Whatever you say. The fact remains that Hilary is reported as strongly backing the nuclear deal. And that mention will remain, as long the sources remain. In fact, I'm going to ad a ref tag right now. Typhoon (talk) 17:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
She was reported as saying she supports the deal but she is clearly willing to undercut it. I could say I support gay rights but if I support these "Religious Freedom" bills than I clearly do not.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 17:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC) 17:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Good, we've now moved from "she's against the deal" to "she was reported to be for, but...". This is progress. Keep it up. Typhoon (talk) 17:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Hillary Clinton[edit]

Typhoon: You have made many, many accusations to and about me regarding my support of Bernie sanders, support you claim does all sorts of bad things to my judgment. I almost never address all that, and have also never stated my own opinion of your sickening apologetics for a depraved woman like Hillary Clinton. This shall be the only time I will directly do the latter. But I'm going to finally have my say on it. Documenting any of what follows is unnecessary. You've already encountered all of it.

Clinton is an abject liar and opportunist of the absolute worst sort. She is literally whatever Hillary works best for her at the moment, on many, many issues -- from gay rights, to healthcare, to the minimum wage, to money in politics. On different occasions, she's claimed she is still rooted in the conservatism of her youth (she was a Goldwater Girl); at others, she claims to be a "centrist"; more recently, and because Sanders became an actual problem, she's claimed to be the "progressive who gets things done." But what she consistently is is a warmonger -- never met a military action, a deadly economic boycott or a bombing campaign she didn't love. The war criminal Henry Kissinger is one of her closest friends. She said about the Egyptian dictator, Hosni Mubarek, that he and his wife are close family friends.

Rather obviously -- indeed, notoriously -- she's whored herself to Wall Street and made many millions of dollars doing it. (And before you get your knickers in a twist, I also call men who merit it "Wall St. whores.")

Now you are seriously trying to argue she isn't pledging to undo the Iran deal. I assure you, she's taken in a lot of money from the Israel Lobby to deliver on exactly that: to undo the Iran deal they loathe. Haim Saban owns her.

I do not respect you. I cannot respect anyone who has the information that you have and who nevertheless supports Hillary Clinton.

You, my dear, are not a progressive. No progressive supports all the death and destruction Hillary Clinton has supported, and will continue to cause, on WOMEN (and children) in the Middle East. Women in America are struggling under gross and obscene income inequality -- including a minimum wage that is a joke. Woman have to hock their futures to go to college. But all that matters to you is that the woman Hillary Clinton be President of the United States, and fuck all the women whose lives she will continue to harm and even destroy.

Finally, I leave you with this nauseating speech of hers about marriage equality from 2004. That was the politically expedient position then. What she did cannot be redeemed. You know she's a gross opportunist and all the other rancid facts of her record, yet you support her. I have more respect for a knuckle-dragging idiot at a Trump rally than I do for you.

There, that shall be my last commentary on your support for Hilary Clinton. Where it belongs, and not filling up talk pages where edits are supposed to be rationally negotiated. Please follow suit.---Mona- (talk) 00:33, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for confirming every bit of suspicion I've had about you. You're emotionally invested in "your" candidate, which causes your fanatical edit warring and seeing Hillary shills in everyone who criticizes your cheerleading for Bernie. I'll concentrate on removing your vandalism and propaganda. Typhoon (talk) 11:17, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

You entirely ignored everything I wrote about Hillary Clinton's record, and persist in making this about me. It's about Hillary Clinton, and supporting a warmongering, Wall St. lackey such as she is. As for Kevin Drum (and the link to him you posted on my talk page), he's an establishment Democrat, of the sort that has gotten this entire election wrong. They really do not get it. Drum himself admits: "I'm old, and I'm a neoliberal sellout. Not as much of one as I used to be, but still." Matt Taibbi is spot on:

For young voters, the foundational issues of our age have been the Iraq invasion, the financial crisis, free trade, mass incarceration, domestic surveillance, police brutality, debt and income inequality, among others.

And to one degree or another, the modern Democratic Party, often including Hillary Clinton personally, has been on the wrong side of virtually all of these issues.

Whatever that record is, it's not a progressive one. There's a reason Michelle Alexander, the author of The New Jim Crow, insists Hillary does not deserve the black vote. You are simply unwilling to look at the evidence. You'd rather lob insults about me. That doesn't change the fact that you are a disreputable supporter of a horrific, largely right-wing woman.

Finally, I doubt you know what the Glass-Steagall Act is, as well as other pieces of crucial legislation that did or would rein in Wall St. She's against them all. But how about another diatribe about how "emotional" and whatever I am? pffft ---Mona- (talk) 23:54, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Silencing Ex-Muslim voices[edit]

Why? I have thought about it many times I still can't imagine what you Westerners gain from this. The only people who would gain anything from it are Hanbalis. So why do you undertake this crusade? What do you possibly gain? Lord Aeonian (talk) 19:23, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

I'm still going trough your comment history on Reddit. From what I've seen so far, you're a regressive yourself, hypocrite. You're OK with removing liberal democracy if it means stamping out religion. Guess what, anti-theist zealotry is still zealotry. You're not so different from the radical Islamists you hate so much. Not when you defend Ataturk and Erdogan; two notorious regressives (but they're anti-islam, so you're OK with that kind of illiberalism and dictatorship). Typhoon (talk) 19:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
I've never defended Erdogan, who is anything but "anti-Islam." You may have confused him for someone else, Erdogan is Turkey's current wannabe sultan. As for Ataturk, say what you will, but Turkey would still a caliphate if he had let the people vote on it. Why don't you just let Texas and Utah secede and become dominionist states? By zealotry I refer not to passionate views but to your uncompromising stance on issues. Just as Mona goes crazy if her PoV is challenged on the Israel/Palestine articles, you just can't bear the fact that non-racists believe the regressive left is a thing. When you first brought me sources saying that the term was mostly used by reactionaries - which I didn't know - I agreed and moved the usage section to the top.
But that wasn't enough for you, was it? No, you had to keep fighting until I just removed everything and let you have your echo chamber. Then recently Mona told me the content was valid and added it back, but in your fantasy world you interpreted that as I "recruiting her." Would having a few dissenting opinions on the page really be the end of the world? Lord Aeonian (talk) 20:17, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
It's ludicrous that you're complaining about echo chambers while dressing up a smear used to silence people with faux-intellectual language. Typhoon (talk) 08:19, 5 May 2016 (UTC)


I am going to apologize for bringing up your past actions here. I didn't mean to accuse you of supporting warmongers when I said your deleting info that I felt handwaved Clinton's foreign policy positions. I doubt you and I are going to get along but, hopefully, this olive branch can calm things down.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 18:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC) 18:47, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Just thought I'd ask[edit]

Do you have any particular preference in regards to gendered pronouns? It's just that I've seen both used and I don't think I've ever seen you affirm or deny either option. If you'd rather not say that's fine too, of course. (talk) 18:44, 4 June 42016 AQD (UTC)

I've never cared which is why I never bothered to tell people. English is a silly language. Typhoon (talk) 07:46, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

And now for something completely different[edit]

Hi Typhoon! I thought you might enjoy this. If not, that's fine too. All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 16:40, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

I'll just wait[edit]

You're not gonna get away with it, my sweet thing. Nope. I'll be back. Vaginas are not enough.---Mona- (talk) 19:10, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

You're insane. Absolutely insane. Typhoon (talk) 19:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
LOL. Sure thing, Vagina Worshipper. Tell me, if Stalin had been names Jospehina, would you have been down with "her?" (You know you would have!)---Mona- (talk) 19:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Are you having a meltdown right now? Because your insults are increasingly erratic. Typhoon (talk) 19:21, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
Typhoon looks like they're having a meltdown. Hate Mona so much, huh? PBfreespace (talk) 19:48, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
"Vagina worshipper"... my ears are burning! But like, jokes aside, what the hell in a handbasket are you scamps up to this time? I come in here all cheery and y'all going on about vajayjays and accusations of insanity like Reverend Black Percy (talk) 11:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

I ask them to give me the "Ken Burns" at the barber[edit]

"Can you atleast give my bowl cut an Alfaalfa?"

Hi Typhoon. I just wanted to say that's a really nice quote you put on your user page. I like Ken Burns, I'm rewatching his series The Civil War right now. That is all for now. All the best, Reverend Black Percy (talk) 11:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

I can't stop laughing[edit]

You recently posted this to the WIGO:E, "One group of BernieBros are practicing "hassle lines" to harass Clinton delegates at the DNC Convention while other BernieBros are simulating getting arrested by cops". Lol. You have actually unironically disavowed direct action which has to be the funniest thing I have ever read.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 18:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC) 18:23, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

If Hillary supporters were doing this to Bernouts, you would be the first to cry about it. Typhoon (talk) 10:35, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
I know because I have never denounced Sanders even though most of the criticisms on his page are from me. But, hey, I a just some supposedly white guy according to non-racist Typhoon.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 16:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC) 16:17, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
And I have no problem with the majority of criticism on Hillary's page. Not that it matters to people like mona. Anyway, you're correct on one thing, I am indeed non-racist. Now if only the same could be said about the Bernouts that label black voters "low-info". Typhoon (talk) 16:42, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Well discounting all other ethnic groups that have supported Sanders is pretty sketchy.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 16:44, 20 June 2016 (UTC) 16:44, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Discounting all the black voters in the south as part of "the confederacy" and calling them repeatedly "low info" is absolutely racist. And the angry Bernouts calling Warren "Pocahontas" for daring to endorse Hillary is even more racist. Typhoon (talk) 16:47, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
You're definitely going to need proof of that but this isn't about Sanders voters this is about you.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 16:53, 20 June 2016 (UTC) 16:53, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
"ever since -fauxcahontas- warren became hillary's attack dog on trump I saw this happening a mile away"; And much more on her twitter, facebook and reddit. You see Owlman, it's not about me, It's about you. You've been burying your head into the sand whenever Sanders' more rabid supporters went FUBAR. Even on this wiki have the resident BernieBros like mona launching incredibly sexist attacks on me, and you never said a word about it. Typhoon (talk) 18:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
Clinton supporters have done this too and you ignore it. Remember when Albright said that "there is a special place in hell for women who don't support women" or when Steinham said that women who support Sanders are doing it to get boys? Simply put, it is an association fallacy to say that Sanders or Clinton are responsible for what their supporters. It is also a purity test to force those supporters to be homogenously progressive. The internet is full of assholes and in a constant dramafest. I am not responsible for them and I am not responsible for you. But don't pretend you deserve some sort of goodwill after calling me a "white, Bernie zealot", assuming Old Guard is priveleged, and you defended Castaigne (you specifically said it was a vandalbinning motivated by hatred from FCP) who bragged about doxing people, harassed users, and voiced his fantasies to assault people. You are a bad joke with a victim complex.--Owlman (talk) (mail) 01:26, 23 June 2016 (UTC) 01:26, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Coop notice[edit]

A case involving you has been raised at the Chicken Coop. Feel free to comment.

Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:03, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
I've left one post, and refuse to participate further in Percy's petty revenge quest for which he cowardly canvassed help. Typhoon (talk) 15:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

To answer your question[edit]

The proceedings were cut short before any punishment was officialized. If that hadn't been the case you would've probably been binned. Though to paraphrase David's suggestion, if you continue in your old ways, more of this tiresome coop-madness is bound to follow. (talk) 13:52, 3 July 42016 AQD (UTC)

Instead of "paraphrases" and theories about how the coop would have went if it wasn't rightfully cut short, I'd want some concrete answers from the mods. As of now, my sysop was removed without a proper coop process, for no official reason. Typhoon (talk) 17:29, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Sheesh, by all means continue being dismissive, antagonistic and self-congratulatory. Why would any mod want to provide concrete answers when you act this way? (talk) 18:34, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
...and so, 141 officially joins the ranks of the vast and pre-concieved conspiracy against Typhoon - the sole honest editor of this site. How the righteous have fallen. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 19:35, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Nowhere did I say or implied that. You're getting pretty desperate now, Percy. Typhoon (talk) 19:49, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Am I part of the conspiracy, too?--Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 19:48, 3 July 2016 (UTC) 19:48, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Eh, calm down. If you don't get into any edit wars, msg me by the end of the week and I'll probably remop you. CorruptUser (talk) 20:18, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
And she got into an edit war the same day you suggested this XP Lord Aeonian (talk) 21:51, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Sysoprevoked and deautopatrolled[edit]

For 1 day due to edit warring. Note that this doesn't imply you're in the wrong -- merely that you warred.

If I forget to give your rights back (autopatrolled), feel free to pop in to my talkpage. 32℉uzzy; 0℃atPotato (talk/stalk) 17:35, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Dunno why you mention sysoprevoke, since you already took it from me previously, and without giving any time-frame or anything (or a proper coop process before). Typhoon (talk) 17:37, 3 July 2016 (UTC)
Weaseloid archived that nonsense, talk to them. I'm just here as a mod; this is unrelated to your coop business. αδελφός ΓυζζγςατΡοτατο (talk/stalk) 17:47, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Are you now, or have you ever been[edit]

A Zionist? (talk) 20:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Dunno, I am apparently a baby-eating, $hillary supporting, murderer and racist. At least according to some of my stalkers on this wiki. Typhoon (talk) 20:49, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

I come in peace[edit]

Hello Typhoon! For what it's worth, I just wanted to say that I thought these additions you made were really worthwhile. Thank you for making them. Makes me wonder what the hell the management at Wikileaks is really thinking. Oh well. That is all. I'll show myself out. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 10:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Owlman just posted this to the WIGO feed... Thoughts? I'll find the door. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 10:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

If you "come in peace" how about you stop edit-warring and ignoring the talk page? I detailed my reasons for removal, and your only response was to throw an insult at me and resume your reverting. Typhoon (talk) 14:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

You find it confusing or inconsistent of me to always proportionally adjust my disposition towards you based on the quality and content of each of your individual actions, as assessed on a case-per-case basisWikipedia? Reverend Black Percy (talk) 17:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
So you have nothing to say about you insulting me and edit warring. Typhoon (talk) 11:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Well, I will concede the following right now; I don't doubt that you feel that that is an apt description of what I've been doing. I very much validate the fact that you likely assess my actions in that light. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 11:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
You say all sorts of things. Typhoon (talk) 11:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
I certainly do! Reverend Black Percy (talk) 11:35, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
You come in peace, you say? another Jewish conspiracy by (((Laurogeita Hamabost))) (talk) 16:43, 5 September 2016 (UTC)