Talk:Laura Loomer/Archive1
[edit]
Is it really warranted? From what I can see, she's a Trump supporter, but not really a Nazi. Correct me if I'm wrong. яεvεятεя σғ ωαη∂αℓιsм, ραтяσℓℓεя σғ ε∂ιтs, ΓУППЯ ・「ҭагк」・асђіεѵеϻԑηтѕ・тіме: 22:44, 1 November 2017 (UTC)
Quoting herself[edit]
https://twitter.com/KrangTNelson/status/953023714697928704 Fuzzy. Cat. Potato! (talk/stalk) 01:30, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
If Loomer merits an RW entry, the current version is not it[edit]
I’ll be blunt: The current format is terrible.
While Loomer’s beliefs seem “RW worthy”, the article is mainly a rather uninformative collection of tweets. We don’t need articles on every alt-right keyboard warrior on the Interwebz, just as we don’t need articles on every crank with a YouTube channel. One indication of Loomer being “RW worthy” enough to have her own article would be sources that rely on her or refer to her when defending similar beliefs or that describe her involvement with others of a similar bend, whereas mainly quoting her tweets just gives the impression that she’s “merely” some nutter with a Twitter account.
Loomer is compared to both Lauren Southern and Pamela Geller, so if Loomer really is important/interesting enough to merit her own, separate article, those on Sourthern and Geller could serve as templates as to what an improved version of this article might look like. ScepticWombat (talk) 05:13, 9 September 2018 (UTC)