Talk:Laura Loomer

	This Alt-right related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

This article contains information about one or more living persons. Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats. Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed. If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

Archives for this talk page:

<1>

, (new)

Twitter

Loomer's Twitter got suspended. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/security/laura-loomer-banned-twitter-after-criticizing-ilhan-omar-n939256 TheEOE (talk) 20:44, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

The people who think she's getting her free speech rights revoked because she said really shitty things about Muslims on Twitter can go cry me a fucking river in a world where journalists and their organizations actually get raided by governments. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓^(T|C) 20:47, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Rational?

Don't know about the rest of this wiki, but based solely upon this one article about this one person, this is the most ridiculously slanted, self-righteous, narrowly opinionated piece of crap i've seen in ages. Facts? Ok, sure, you use facts to point out various events and then use this person as your own personal platform of bigotry. Is it worth editing? Hell no. The entire article is bullshit. Best advice? Start it over from scratch, find somebody that doesn't have their head up their ass to edit it, and if she's worth an article on her merits, then fine, leave it. Using this wiki as a platform for personal prejudice, however, has basically turned me away from this entire wiki. Why did i find this? I was looking her up to find out some "facts" and this was in the list. This is the first and only article i've ever seen on this wiki and no i don't intend to waste my time to see if this is anomalous. 76.94.189.154 (talk) 01:32, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

@76.94.189.154 "But I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki!" Drink! TheEOE (talk) 02:31, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Apparently, even when the majority of this article is just quotes from this character, we still get categorized as "slanted" and "narrowly opinionated". --It's-a me, 🎄LeftyGreenMario!🎄 03:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Is this your way 76.94.189.154 of telling us you're anti-rational or perhaps irrational? Answer: Yes. Be gone from this site. Your self-victimization diatribes won't be missed.Ty Incognito (talk) 22:32, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

maga bomber

https://mobile.twitter.com/KrangTNelson/status/1055885402391937024 FᴜᴢᴢʏCᴀᴛPᴏᴛᴀᴛᴏ, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 13:22, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Birtherism towards Harris

https://newrepublic.com/post/185293/laura-loomer-kamala-harris-birtherism

Might wanna add this stuff. Arcadium Trancefer (talk) 11:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Angry White Men and Farrakhan

I don't understand where the claim that Angry White Men "praises" Farrakhan is from. In this article, they denounce Farrakhan as an anti-semite and note that he's being defended by David Duke, of all people. This article notes that "For years Louis Farrakhan has spouted antisemitic nonsense". And this article points at Farrakhan for spreading a debunked and stupid claim that Jews were disproportionately responsible for the Atlantic slave trade. I can see no evidence of positive references to Farrakhan. Chef Moosolini’s Ristorante Italiano^{Make a Reservation} 19:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)