Talk:Nazi analogies/Archive1

This is an archive page, last updated 21 January 2024. Please do not make edits to this page.

Archives for this talk page:  , (new)(back)

Attribution

Some content from http://evolutionwiki.org/wiki/Hitler_Card Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 18:14, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Using this picture

Any chance we could use the following random dump image for the article? ^^ http://i.imgur.com/VQYcqTp.jpg Reverend Black Percy (talk) 10:54, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

I don't see the problem, but it might be too memeish (shall we say) to have any lasting value. Zero ^{(talk - contributions)} 15:43, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Ex mayors question

Successive Mayors of London Red Newt Ken and Bojo Bike made Hitler comparisons within a few days. Is this an example of Godwin's Law meets the Horseshoe theory? 86.191.125.244 (talk) 13:13, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

reductio ad Hitlerum

Godwin's is certainly related to reductio ad Hitlerum, but is most definitely not the same thing --Rusty Lugnuts (talk) 00:33, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Curzan's Law

This is based off of something I learned on the latest episode of Adam Ruins Everything. This law is quite similar Godwin's Law, but instead of being about Nazism, it's about grammar Nazism. "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of one member claiming they have won an argument and/or are leaving due to another member making a minor grammar error, real or imagined, approaches one." —вιgℓʝвιgℓ (ᴛᴀʟᴋ/sᴛᴀʟᴋ) 15:14, 21 August 2017 (UTC)