There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Necrophilia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Delete. Blue (pester) 02:25, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Why? Fallacy (talk) 02:34, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- What value does it provide?--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:35, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- It's just an article on yet another taboo sexual practice. They're not really necessary, but I figure they're nice to have. Fallacy (talk) 02:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Meh, there's a slew of that stuff all over the Web. See RW:MISSION.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:41, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- I'd say because it's part of the slippery slope fallacy used by wingnuts to whistleblow against the acceptance of lgbt and personal sexual freedom between consenting parties, when it goes outside what's traditionally acceptede. Rather, not to be polically correct, but why the pun about "getting too close to granma" in the title, I sense it might be funny in a gerontophilia (which in this case includes incest) article, not necrophilia, I mean, granma is not dead --78.15.246.30 (talk) 17:25, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Meh, there's a slew of that stuff all over the Web. See RW:MISSION.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:41, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- It's just an article on yet another taboo sexual practice. They're not really necessary, but I figure they're nice to have. Fallacy (talk) 02:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- What value does it provide?--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:35, 11 October 2011 (UTC)