|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
Talk:Necrophilia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Delete. Blue (pester) 02:25, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Why? Fallacy (talk) 02:34, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- What value does it provide?--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:35, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- It's just an article on yet another taboo sexual practice. They're not really necessary, but I figure they're nice to have. Fallacy (talk) 02:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Meh, there's a slew of that stuff all over the Web. See RW:MISSION.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:41, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- I'd say because it's part of the slippery slope fallacy used by wingnuts to whistleblow against the acceptance of lgbt and personal sexual freedom between consenting parties, when it goes outside what's traditionally acceptede. Rather, not to be polically correct, but why the pun about "getting too close to granma" in the title, I sense it might be funny in a gerontophilia (which in this case includes incest) article, not necrophilia, I mean, granma is not dead --78.15.246.30 (talk) 17:25, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Meh, there's a slew of that stuff all over the Web. See RW:MISSION.--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:41, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- It's just an article on yet another taboo sexual practice. They're not really necessary, but I figure they're nice to have. Fallacy (talk) 02:38, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- What value does it provide?--Colonel Sanders (talk) 02:35, 11 October 2011 (UTC)