Talk:No-go zone

	This Racialism related article has not received a brainstar for quality. Please consider expanding the article appropriately. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

When was this page created? 2015?

If it's really been that long, this page SERIOUSLY needs more goat. ASAP. I've heard of this myth countless times, and I would like to see people put more effort into refuting the "no-go zone" claim. TheMyon (talk) 14:03, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

How do you prove that no-go zones don't exist? The claims are so vague that they don't even talk about specific areas that you could prove non-Muslims can enter - it's just rumor and nonsense. (And yes I know this is an old comment I'm responding to, but the article is still tagged.) --Annanoon (talk) 12:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

One loonspud on Farcebok claimed that the entire London Borough of Waltham Forest is a no-go zone for non-Muslims. Having lived in said borough for about thirty-five years – and having two Christian churches within a three minute walk of the front door – without once being hassled for being a filthy heathen I'm pretty sure this was yet another baseless claim cobbled together from EDL press releases and the Daily Fail. Mr Larrington (talk) 12:58, 23 September 2022 (UTC)

A myth?

Try to go with a kippa, a star of David pendant or a t-shirt with Hebrew writing through a predominantly Muslim area of any big city of Western Europe. Or read up on how coupla multiple police vans full of cops were needed to make an arrest of a well-connected gang member, because he called up his relations. Demonizing is bad, but the denial of problems you do here is arguably worse.--2A02:8070:E93:E800:AC37:13B0:4C4B:C9BA (talk) 12:47, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

The No Go Zone myth is that Muslim-majority neighbourhoods are about the only neighbourhoods where you can't walk in, and it's entirely because of religious police gangs. Police not stomping crime in an area because of general gang problems could happen anywhere.-- Forerunner (talk) 16:28, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

And here goes the usual denials and misdirections, as I thought. --2A02:8070:181:4A80:9C8A:F1C4:FBF6:AF9D (talk) 15:07, 22 April 2020 (UTC)

Denial? Misdirections? Nay. You brought fourth a claim of dubious origin without strong evidence, and thusly can be dismissed. ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 15:12, 22 April 2020 (UTC)