Talk:Peter Duesberg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This article contains information about one or more living persons. Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats. |
Substitute this for the wikipedia article - it is less biased and equally informative. — Unsigned, by: 159.105.80.141 / talk / contribs
- No. Although you can add the template:wp if you want to inform people of the less biased version. RW does not and will not copy and paste Wikipedia articles. It's A) pointless and B) not nearly half as much fun.
bomination 19:38, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- The Bon seems to be saying that the WP article should be replaced by the (better) RW one. It likes us. This message brought to you by:
respondand honey 20:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Really? I was interpreting it the other way... moi bad. But if we did replace the WP article with the RW one, that would mean the RW article was the same as the WP, so we'd have to bias and snark it up even further. bomination 22:00, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Really? I was interpreting it the other way... moi bad. But if we did replace the WP article with the RW one, that would mean the RW article was the same as the WP, so we'd have to bias and snark it up even further.
- The Bon seems to be saying that the WP article should be replaced by the (better) RW one. It likes us. This message brought to you by:
- The journal 'Medical Hypotheses' is peer reviewed. Perhaps it was not in 2009? — Unsigned, by: 130.64.25.60 / talk / contribs
- It was not peer reviewed before 2010. There was a big fight over this in 2009 and the result was that since mid-2010 the journal has been peer reviewed. See the Wikipedia article: Medical Hypotheses.
Bongolian (talk) 19:44, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- It was not peer reviewed before 2010. There was a big fight over this in 2009 and the result was that since mid-2010 the journal has been peer reviewed. See the Wikipedia article: Medical Hypotheses.