From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


What's the mission element here? I assume the occasional mentions that they evolved, and that this evolution can be traced in the fossil record, could be saved, but the rest is an unfinished essay by a fan. We could cut 95%, but what's the point of the remainder? SophieWilder 12:41, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

I think we need a NOT A BLOODY ENCYCLOPEDIA template. ТyBother me 12:44, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Template:Rwis0e? SophieWilder 12:54, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Yes, but with a better name, gimme a sec. ТyBother me 12:57, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
As much as I like science, we're never going to do the strictly factual stuff as well as ToW. Redchuck.gif ГенгисIs the Pope a Catholic?Moderator 13:03, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
This outline stuff belongs on Wikispecies or something similar. SophieWilder 13:45, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Young Earth Creationists come here to argue. They read this article and their faith is disturbed. Refer them to Wikispecies and they won't follow the link. Proxima Centauri (talk) 13:55, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
... ТyBother me 13:57, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
(sigh) If they've come here to argue, they won't have their faith disturbed by an article which describes a bunch of dead fish but barely bothers to argue a case for evolution. You assume too much about the creationist mindset. They won't be swayed by a mere mention of evolution when they have an army of true believers fighting to refute it. SophieWilder 14:02, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Facepalm.gif Redchuck.gif ГенгисYou have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you.Moderator 14:07, 8 October 2012 (UTC)