Information icon.svg The election booth for the RationalWiki 2019 Moderator Election is now open. Cast your votes today!

Talk:Political parties of Germany

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Great work, UHM!--ADtalkModerator 16:26, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, what the fuck?[edit]

"Political parties of Germany" Really? Off-topic, irrelevant, just a list of political parties of a singular country. Delete. AceThe Rep Grows Bigger 11:59, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

All of this too, then? --84.158.95.56 (talk) 12:14, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Hmm, keep. ТyNot updated with a witty slogan this week 12:20, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Hey dipshit, those are all categories - this is a standalone article. AceThe Rep Grows Bigger 21:58, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
A standalone article is better than making 5-6 separate ones on the specific parties. Osaka Sun (talk) 22:07, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Also: Political parties of Canada; Political parties of the United Kingdom... the rot runs deap! Peter Rapidly running out of marmite 22:03, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Thos two articles are far more informative and have many links to individual pages. This is a list and almost exclusively a list. AceThe Rep Grows Bigger 22:05, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Moron, the individual articles in the categories... Seriously were you born this stupid or did you had to fall on your head a few times to get that stupid? And hey, if that list bothers you we can make a long article for every single one of these parties! Oh if I just think about the history of the SPD that's a 5.000er... --84.158.77.228 (talk) 23:07, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Hey fuck you asshole. Let me explain something to you as your extreme mental retardation (compounded by what I assume is a grotesque cleft-palette which would explain why you'd have difficulty with even sounding out the words I am typing to help with your understanding) seemingly can't grapple with. Those categories list individual articles about individual parties. This is an article which lists individual parties. It is not comparable to a category. A category is not an article but a reference list. This is an article which is a reference list. I hope this has been enlightening for you...you vacuous waste of human excrement. Fit only to be cast aside as a useless quivering mess not unlike the spunk you fill a sock with every night while imagining what could have been if only you were not held back by your revolting personality. AceThe Rep Grows Bigger 23:36, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
Oh my god! I am so enlightened right now! Thank you for all your benevolent wolrd Saint Ace!
Nah, let's stop pretending about dialogue, I don't give a shit about your opinion on anything, go fuck yourself and take another sip from that drink so the world can get rid of oxygon thiefs lieke you a bit earlier. Majority opinion tells you to fuck off, so fuck off you liquor bag. --84.158.77.228 (talk) 09:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks champ! AceThe Rep Grows Bigger 09:48, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Serously though, does anyone else wanna weigh in here? AceThe Rep Grows Bigger 09:56, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
You're poking it with a stick. Osaka Sun (talk) 10:04, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
I wasn't poking anyone with a stick - it was the worthless ballbag that rode in here and suggested I nominated for deletion because of some kind of vendetta when in actually fact I hit this page via the random page link and thought it looked like nothing more than a list. AceThe Rep Grows Bigger 20:49, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
(EC)We have similar for Britain and Canada, so why not this? It could be a more entertaining read, though. It's too much like an encyclopedia entry at the moment, with nothing to make you want to read the whole thing. A few jokes and curious factoids should liven it up. Rennie McGreet (talk) 10:12, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
MOARR HITLER!? Redchuck.gif ГенгисOur ignorance is God; what we know is science.Moderator 10:20, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
If anybody wants to put some jokes in, go ahead. --84.158.77.228 (talk) 10:39, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

AfD - the party, not the process[edit]

I'd say the batshit right wing party is definitely on mission. Not least because they oppose wind energy due to "infrasound" and have a thing or two to say about gays and "gender-mainstreaming". They might even deserve their own article... What do y'all think? Avengerofthe BoN (talk) 13:20, 10 October 2015 (UTC)