2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $8765.50Goal: $10000

Talk:Precision Herbs

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Biased?[edit]

I don't think I've read any article that was more biased against herbal treatments in my lifetime. I've never received anything from Precision Herbs that did not do exactly what it was supposed to do. Not only myself, but several family members and colleagues have also used Precision Herbs under the recommendation of a health professional and achieved results where modern medicine had routinely failed.— Unsigned, by: 24.140.179.129 / talk / contribs

Please sign your talk page comments. яεvεятεя σғ ωαη∂αℓιsм, ραтяσℓℓεя σғ ε∂ιтs, ΓУППЯ ・「ҭагк」・асђіεѵеϻԑηтѕ・тіме: 01:17, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Anecdotes do not constitute (scientific) evidence. Furthermore, who were those "health professionals"? Are you sure it was not the placebo effect in action? Unless something is clinically proven, it cannot be called a medical treatment. Nerd271 (talk) 01:58, 5 November 2017 (UTC)