Talk:Pseudolinguistics

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon pseudoscience.svg

This pseudoscience related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Copperbrain.png

Celtic and Berber[edit]

"The idea that somehow, Celtic and Berber languages are related (quite popular in some circles in France). " - Although one language is Indo-European, and the other is not, there are some interesting parallels between these languages in syntax etc. --Albannach (talk) 17:55, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

You can always find some correspondences between any two languages. This is especially the case if you use a wide definition of "correspondence". The trick is to show that you have a greater number of correspondences than you would expect to find by chance.--Bob"I think you'll find it's more complicated than that." 14:55, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
True. The corresponding features suggest a substrate. The idea's not completely ludicrous as Goidelic may originate in Iberia, which would be more open to Berber influence. AFAIK, said influences cannot be found in Gaulish.Albannach (talk) 15:23, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

I was a little confused on this one myself. Are they not close enough to share aerial features? Cerealbox (talk) 21:56, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

The first graffiti[edit]

... in all languages would have included variants on 'X was here', 'Y is (negative/weasel words)' 'I did W with Z' and 'A has a big/small/ugly etc B', 'God/Big Brother/Blabbermouth next door is watching you' and similar. Is this pseudolinguistics or an accurate description of human nature? 82.44.143.26 (talk) 16:57, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Quora mention[edit]

This article has been mentioned positively in this Quora answer.--Кřěĵ (ṫåɬк) 05:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)