There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Pseudolinguistics
Celtic and Berber[edit]
"The idea that somehow, Celtic and Berber languages are related (quite popular in some circles in France). " - Although one language is Indo-European, and the other is not, there are some interesting parallels between these languages in syntax etc. --Albannach (talk) 17:55, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
- You can always find some correspondences between any two languages. This is especially the case if you use a wide definition of "correspondence". The trick is to show that you have a greater number of correspondences than you would expect to find by chance.--Bob"I think you'll find it's more complicated than that." 14:55, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
I was a little confused on this one myself. Are they not close enough to share aerial features? Cerealbox (talk) 21:56, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
The first graffiti[edit]
... in all languages would have included variants on 'X was here', 'Y is (negative/weasel words)' 'I did W with Z' and 'A has a big/small/ugly etc B', 'God/Big Brother/Blabbermouth next door is watching you' and similar. Is this pseudolinguistics or an accurate description of human nature? 82.44.143.26 (talk) 16:57, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
Quora mention[edit]
This article has been mentioned positively in this Quora answer.--Кřěĵ (ṫåɬк) 05:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)