Talk:RationalWiki/Archive2

This is an archive page, last updated 3 May 2016. Please do not make edits to this page.

Archives for this talk page:

<1>, <3>, <4>, <5>, <6>, <7>

, (new)(back)

YouTube

I was just putting a bunch of random things on YouTube to see if there were any results... "No Videos found for 'rationalwiki'". CP has a few, but mainly just "WTH?!" style. Fuzzy|AFD 20:53, 2 April 2008 (EDT)

History section

So far it's only one line. I think something about RW 1.0 and its origins could be included, but I don't have the dates. 07:50, 18 September 2008 (EDT) Totnesmartin

I was just about to raise this. We are currently calling this RationalWiki 3.0 Which began here. Anyone know when RationalWiki 1.0 started? - π 03:50, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Feb or Mar 2007. Ask Trent? Also, we have a RW:history article that is reasonably accurate, please to update. ħuman 07:20, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

I fix, ok? ħuman 07:22, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

This part sucks

Indeed, it is as if Andrew Schlafly, in an overly complicated metaphor, was maritally raped by a stick of kryptonite, and, choosing life, gave birth to Conservapedia. A child, from the moment of conception (i.e., when life begins), bent on its own destruction. This a hideous chimaera of bad writing and clumsy metaphor. It also incorrectly implies that CP wants to destroy itself, which isn't so. I'd delete it but I'm a newbie and I don't want to tread on people's toes. Real first name and last initial 12:41, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

It is suppose to be a clumsy metaphor. - π 12:46, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

But why have a clumsy metaphor? It's not even about this site, it just looks like someone stuck in a rant about Conservapedia that wouldn't fit elsewhere. Real first name and last initial 12:52, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Well lets see if anyone else shows up to comment shall we? - π 12:56, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Verily, I believe that Rfn&li hath an point. ^{I am eating} _& honey^chat 12:59, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

I support ditch, any more takers? - π 13:01, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Actually it would be nice to elaborate more on what we do now at that point instead of looking back at CP so much. - π 13:04, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

True. But I'd definitely ditch that line. –SuspectedReplicant^{retire me} 13:05, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Okay I have removed the paragraph, it is definitely a nice segue to pimp some of our new stuff. - π 13:19, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

I think that whole section needs to be re-worked to make it less CP. The CP stuff should go to the history section.--Bob^{Not Jim} 13:26, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

Feel free. Or maybe a section RationalWiki and Conservapedia? - π 13:32, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

It's just that I'm a bit reluctant to edit such a foundational article without a bit of discussion first.--Bob^{Not Jim} 14:13, 29 October 2009 (UTC)

founder?

more on this and why founded again? Tommy0210 (talk) 23:47, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

See RationalWiki:History. Does that answer your questions? -- Nx / talk 23:50, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

RW talk pages

At least one library is blocking (some of) them on grounds of profanity.

(Wash hands with soap and water, smack wrists, and behave) 82.198.250.69 (talk) 17:18, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Like I told you over at the Saloon Bar--too bad for them that their Puritanism gets in their way of engaging with the world. Someone should buy them a drink and tell them to relax. P-Foster (talk) 17:21, 1 June 2010 (UTC)