'...insolence implies an emotional relationship which does not and could not exist between us.' (Blakes 7) — Unsigned, by: 184.108.40.206 / talk / contribs 16:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Are crass ad hominem attacks really acceptable here?
"Narad is a tremendous douche suffering from Dunning-Kruger."
This is just plain rude. It also sounds like the insult a teenager would use. — Unsigned, by: Megsaint / talk / contribs
- This seems like an argumentum ad argumentum ad hominem, given that we're not trying to debate their ideas, just stating that they are a tremendous douche suffering from Dunning-Kruger. Spriggina (prat) (insatser) @ 22:57, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
- That is a highly subjective opinion, stated in rude, puerile terms. It should have no place here. — Unsigned, by: Megsaint / talk / contribs
- @Megsaint On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button: on the toolbar above the edit panel. You can also indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line. Thank you. Comrade GC (talk) 14:31, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
- I note that this edit was made by former window-washer Travis Schwochert, who has been repeatedly banned for sockpuppetry at RI. Whatever; it's true that the former Herr Doktor Bimler was the wittiest commenter. Might as well stet it. Narad from RI (talk) 21:28, 25 January 2018 (UTC)