There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Thought Catalog
Category[edit]
Is there a category for "probably good ideas that went down the drain"? Not that I necessarily think this was a good idea, mind you, it just for some reason reminded me of that. |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ WHO THE HELL DO YOU THINK I AM!? 18:52, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
- Naive ideas, maybe. It did (and still does) hit its angstful college humanities student right there with startling accuracy. And their actual hit count hasn't gone down at all, and the money still rolls in - David Gerard (talk) 19:25, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
"Basically, they've found a way to monetize shitposting."[edit]
Hasn't the Daily Mail been doing that since 1910? Bicyclewheel 08:47, 11 September 2015 (UTC)