RationalWiki's 2020 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $3500Goal: $3500

Talk:Vatican City

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

I'm afraid the "Little known fact" about a Mithraeum beneath the Vatican is little known because it's wrong, unless you have some sources I don't. I seem to recall there is a Mithraeum beneath the church of St. Clemente, though. I've also never heard of Mithras being born to a virgin, but rather that he sprung out of a rock or some sort of cosmic egg or something.

Basic fact-checking: Now highly recommended by four out of five dentists. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 09:39, 15 September 2008 (EDT)

I'd better go and make it even less known then... 09:49, 15 September 2008 (EDT) Totnesmartin
This information originates from a chain letter (sadly, snopes doesn't have a debunking I checked.) Amusingly, it suckered Christopher Hitchens, it's in God is not great too :D --JeevesMkII 10:08, 15 September 2008 (EDT)
And The Jesus Mysteries, the book I found it in. Oh well. Totnesmartin 10:14, 15 September 2008 (EDT)

Is there a Benny (German accent) 'Vat I cann...' joke? 82.198.250.69 (talk) 18:02, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

A strange state[edit]

Reading this article it is unclear whether we should regard the Vatican as a state or not. Section one calls it a country, section two throws doubt on its status and section three seems fairly sure it is a state. Would it be better to present the arguments for and against in one paragraph rather then have the spread through the article? This will imply a very significant re-write though.--BobSpring is sprung! 15:06, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Why six/12 Popes rather than 4 (white, black, red and retired)? 171.33.222.26 (talk) 17:52, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Financial scandal[edit]

Vatican financial scandal: Will Pope Francis be an agent of reform?
Material here is worth adding to the article. Proxima Centauri (talk) 19:30, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

You should probably stop ignoring the ongoing discussion on your talk page about your work on Catholicism-related articles before that happens. There are tensions which need to be resolved. Inspiration Move me brightly. 19:40, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

When will the latest 'hands in the till' scandal be mentioned here? 171.33.222.26 (talk) 15:16, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Red Pope[edit]

While researching something else came across [1] - blaming the usual collection of suspects and [2] - somewhat likewise. 31.51.114.64 (talk) 23:00, 29 July 2017 (UTC)