Talk:Vivos
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Delete?[edit]
My initial thought was that this was spam. Even if it isn't, it is clearly off-mission and ought to be deleted anyways. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 17:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Sure resembles spam. However, also resembles woo merchants, so would be on-mission if someone can be bothered investigating them - David Gerard (talk) 17:42, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Did you click the link & watch the video? The connections with survivalism / end times / 2012 / exploiting people's deepest fears for profit put it well within the site missions. Needs a bit for info if it's to be a stand-alone article. Otherwise it could be merged as a section in our survivalism article. ŴêâŝêîôîďMethinks it is a Weasel 17:46, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- I've expanded it as bit to make it a reasonable short article. As far as I can tell, the push has been strongly towards the 2012 nutters rather than survivalism in general - David Gerard (talk) 17:56, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- These movies are unbelievable. ŴêâŝêîôîďMethinks it is a Weasel 18:00, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Expanded heaps more. Thanks, spamming BON! - David Gerard (talk) 18:11, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Also expanded. We were trying to do rewrites simultaneous, but I think I've included everything of yours in too. Now what we need are some links to this in other relevant articles. ŴêâŝêîôîďMethinks it is a Weasel 19:43, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Expanded heaps more. Thanks, spamming BON! - David Gerard (talk) 18:11, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- These movies are unbelievable. ŴêâŝêîôîďMethinks it is a Weasel 18:00, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- I've expanded it as bit to make it a reasonable short article. As far as I can tell, the push has been strongly towards the 2012 nutters rather than survivalism in general - David Gerard (talk) 17:56, 15 July 2010 (UTC)