There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2019.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
Directly marketing woo
Picked up a thin catalogue in a friend's house, among other things it had :
- Magnatherapy - magnetic 1200 gauss bracelets, necklaces, belts, watches & even spectaclesavers. Dunno what it's supposed to 'cure' but ....
- Cupping (sounds downright diabolical) - "practitioners beleve applying a partial vacuum on the skin ... Lymph ...chi ... Blah blah waffle ... [Love bites (hickeys?) anyone?]
- All manner of hair-loss & baldness cures from pigeon droppings through (actually in the catalogue) 'Nourkrin' tablets (?) to lasering the scalp.
Stangely (not) there was no website for the company viva! direct.
- I love cupping...it always fools my med students.User:PalMD
I just want to thank each and every one of y'all for all you've done to your bodies.
Coffee Woo article?
Early Computer core memory used square loop hysteresis ferrite cores. How they worked was sorta magic to those without expert knowledge of physics. Substantial early work in the field was carried out by the Shanghai-born American physicists An Wang and Way-Dong Woo... So there! :-) 188.8.131.52 (talk) 21:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
"Woo" and "woowoo" is used in the 1941 war film Parachute Battalion as a reference to silliness in flirting (with females in general, but the dummy in particular). A war propaganda educational movie meant for a popular audience would only include it if it was recognised as fairly common popular usage. 184.108.40.206 (talk) 19:01, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Levels of woo
To what extent are there different levels of woo - from the relatively harmless to the 'causing serious problems' - and how can they be classified. 'Do not swim for half an hour after eating' and suchlike would be at the harmless end. 220.127.116.11 (talk) 22:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Is sometimes yesterday's area of exciting new research - and vice versa.
Probably most 'firm' topics have a 'halo of woo' around them - misunderstandings, false overlaps, creative misinterpretations, possibilities floating around the discussions, extrapolations into illogicality, those who want the comfort of a deeper structure that 'others do understand', those who make money or get authority by promoting certainty in a world which others find too inexplicable otherwise, etc, and some 'new areas of research' will be 90% woo and guff and 10% viable/sensible. #Some# of the theories will prove valid, helpful or just 'if you like it, might as well follow it.' Anna Livia (talk) 18:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)