Talk:Zebra

Unless anyone can think of a good story about how stripes work to break up outlines and thus work as camouflage then this should probably go as well.--Herbert the Hamster 04:30, 4 December 2008 (EST)

if you can work it into an argument for evolution then go ahead. If not, then yeah, there's no point having random articles about every animal in the zoo for its own sake. Except aardvarks, cos they're cool. Totnesmartin 04:35, 4 December 2008 (EST)

I guess that I could, but I'm not sure that it would be worth the effort. Ooo we have a "fun" space?--Herbert the Hamster 04:39, 4 December 2008 (EST)

Oh, we have a fun space. Sometimes we have mainspace and Fun versions of the same subject, eg Bible and Fun:Bible. Totnesmartin 05:41, 4 December 2008 (EST)

Well, apparently the black with white or white with black issue is not an issue. Partially relevant, interesting regardless. I'm looking up evolution, but you can use it as creationist snark too. ArmondikoV^theist 05:50, 4 December 2008 (EST)

I vote for removal. We really don't need stubby, unformatted articles full of pointless red links on every damn critter anyone can think of. It's not even funny :( ħuman 21:54, 5 December 2008 (EST)

I agree.--Herbert the Hamster 03:39, 6 December 2008 (EST)

I too, but you created it in the first place! Fall down^{— Unsigned, by: 89.106.244.8 / talk / contribs}

I think I'm going to redirect it to horse, like tomorrow, if no one minds. ħuman 04:35, 6 December 2008 (EST)

I created a number of articles when I first came here and was unaware of the nature of the wiki (and people took a while to clue me in.) Frankly I now regret that I created some of them.--Herbert the Hamster 05:07, 6 December 2008 (EST)

I know, I saw the history, and am just trying to salvage ;) Horse worked out well. This might be best redirected there. I've seen your amusing user page, it's funny. No offense is ever implied when we say "oh should we move this" or "oh should we change this". Really. ħuman 05:11, 6 December 2008 (EST)

PS, Hamstead, "people took a while to clue you in"??? The template on your talk page (12/3) included lots of links describing what we are doing. So does our main fucking page. Also, up comes the question of how did you find us, and what did you think we are? Dumbass. ħuman 05:29, 6 December 2008 (EST)

Human I'm starting to think you are the dumbass. I said I was fucking regretted writing them. I was going to say no more about it, but I'm fucked if I'm just going to lie down and let you insult me.--Herbert the Hamster 06:45, 6 December 2008 (EST)

The above was written in the heat of the moment. I should probably have used more parliamentary language.--Herbert the Hamster 07:15, 6 December 2008 (EST)

And someone just enquired what happened to SusanG. Steady on there, H. _and marmite 05:34, 6 December 2008 (EST)

Which "H" are you talking to? And the comment above came after replying to HH in about five places where they whined about "not being told what this wiki is about". Reality check, the main page usually tells new users what is going on on a wiki, as did the "welcome" template left for HH three days ago. Next topic: If you think Susan vanished because of me, you might need to make a case, since that's an ugly accusation. Personally, I think she left for non-wiki reasons, but even to explain that might violate subtle talk page comments gathered over the last year and a half. Next topic: What are you suggesting really? Please be clear and not insinuating. ħuman 05:50, 6 December 2008 (EST)

Oh hai guise. So what's going on in this thread? Do you like zebras? I like zebras. --AKjeldsen^{Cum dissensie} 07:29, 6 December 2008 (EST)

Hello. My entry to RW was a little rocky as my user pages points out. I created some rather irrelevant stubs - including this one. Human and I seem to be somewhat at loggerheads.--Herbert the Hamster 07:41, 6 December 2008 (EST)

I redirected this to horse since teh zibran are mentioned there. ħuman 01:55, 7 December 2008 (EST)