Talk:Zoe Quinn

Why isn't this a redirect?

There's a lot more information about Zoe Quinn starting at Gamergate#The_origins_of_Gamergate than there is here. I don't see why the extra references here couldn't just be added to Gamergate, List of Gamergate claims, and Timeline of Gamergate instead. 50.1.143.44 (talk) 08:06, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Just let it die man. It was fun trolling her and we have moved on after destroying any credit she has in gameing. This goes for all the LW's We have new orders and new targets. 2d4chanfag (talk) 11:12, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

I think you have me confused for someone else.

Allow me to make my stance more clear: the Gamergate "controversy" was, is, and will always be a steaming sack of neoreactionary, hypocritical, misogynistic horseshit. I'm not one of them (may the gods forbid.) All I'm saying is that the article that's here now is less informative than the redirect that was in its place a few days ago. If you think it can be grown into a superb article on its own rather than the stub it is now, then be my guest. 50.1.143.44 (talk) 02:14, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

If you think the article needs to improved, then just do it. No one is going to stop you. 2d4chanfag (talk) 02:53, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Should This Be A Redirect

Seriously, should it just redirect to Gamergate? RoninMacbeth (talk) 20:30, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

As it stands, there is no information on this article that can stand on its own. Zoe Quinn and Gamergate are pretty much intertwined, and considering our missionality, I don't think there's much to gain by making her separate from the article. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓^(T|C) 20:38, 21 September 2018 (UTC)