User talk:BabyLuigiOnFire

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

ReligiousNutCar.jpg I'd really rather you revert any dickwads creating useless space on my talk page. Thanks.

This page is automatically archived by Archiver
Archives for this talk page:

Christina Sommers

What's going on? I'm editing Christina Hoff Sommers's page to include a more neutral, accurate tone of her work. If you disagree with something I've said, be productive and send it to talk. — Unsigned, by: Walle637 / talk / contribs

I'm not the one conducting the edit war on her page. If an editor disagrees with your edit and undos it, do not add it back. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 05:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Uncle Joe

Joseph StalinWikipedia was not Russian and never claimed to be. He was Georgian. Nerd (talk) 01:48, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, sis, I'm sure you realize that. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 01:50, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
I knew that because Russia but you still said "Mother Russia" in your edit summary and my response was aimed at that. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 03:55, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Ah, but the linchpin of the Soviet Union was Russia. So that's why. Nerd (talk) 17:07, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Are you and LGM really twins?

Asking for a friend.--Don Juan (talk) 22:53, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Yeah, we're twins, @Don Juan. LGM might have already answered by now but meh БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 02:04, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
@Don Juan Indeed we are. Identical. I mean I have all the birth certificates and IDs but I'd really rather you just take my word for it. :) --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 02:08, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
@LeftyGreenMario I don't know, I may be able to blackmail you in some way if you give me your ID... I didn't say that, you saw nothing. On a more semi-serious note, congratulations on being identical twins. I`m a male, but all of my siblings are female. None are twins.--Don Juan (talk) 08:32, 4 December 2018 (UTC)
Just posting a picture would do as much as posting your ID, just saying... (talk) 03:23, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Don't worry, I already have a picture of myself on my user page, so people know who they're dealing with. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 03:38, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Crazy Ivan Maneuver

Since you ask, I am a good person. I am not a bad person. This is the Crazy IvanWikipedia Maneuver. Incidentally, there is an active service French nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarine named Le Terrible. Nerd (talk) 00:53, 18 December 2018 (UTC)

Aw man, I thought you might had a hand in building that stupid colorful cathedral that's the only building Russians live in. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 00:54, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Miss, I'm not a construction worker. I'm a mushroom farmer, just like my parents, and that French submarine. Nerd (talk) 01:02, 18 December 2018 (UTC)


Did you know that it actually stands for "Mushroom Kingdom Ultra"? Conspirate (talk) 13:34, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Important Message

You've been nominated in the upcoming moderator elections. See the nomination at RationalWiki:Moderator elections/Nominations. Tinribmancer (talk) 16:12, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

an award

Mario-go.png For furthering the ideals of RationalWiki in a most outstanding fashion.

Cosmikdebris (talk) 03:35, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

How come LeftyGreenMario hasn't gotten an award for this, huh? БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 03:44, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Be patient. Cosmikdebris (talk) 03:44, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
What you gonna do, make an award with a picture of Baby Luigi in it for her? БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 03:45, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
I'm not that imaginative tonight. She'll have to settle for the same award I gave you. Cosmikdebris (talk) 03:50, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Were you thinking of something like this?
Baby On Fire.png For furthering the ideals of RationalWiki in a most outstanding fashion.

Cosmikdebris (talk) 04:27, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Close enough. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 05:55, 12 April 2020 (UTC)

Not a vandal

I paroled that user you vandal binned because they weren’t a vandal. Please use the vandal bin for vandals - not because you don’t like a user. That’s not how it works. AceModerator|

That person is likely a troll. We shouldn't keep trolls around. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 09:03, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Still not a vandal. AceModerator 09:07, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Still not worth keeping around. The user has no intentions of improving this place and thus should get booted. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 09:08, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
That’s not how it works. Vandal binning is for vandals. AceModerator 09:10, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Still not worth keeping around. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 09:10, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
The consensus around here is we ban trolls. Oxyaena Harass 09:11, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Not a valid reason for the vandal bin. AceModerator 09:12, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
It's practically the same thing, except bans don't allow people to edit at all while vandal bins still allow people to edit. In fact, it should be the opposite: blatant article vandalism should be indefinitely banned while bad faith trolling should be prone to restrictive editing. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 09:14, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Why do you want this user around Ace --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 09:16, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Not a vandal and has done nothing to deserve an infinite ban. It’s pretty clear. AceModerator 09:17, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
This user is a troll and is definitely not here to improve the wiki. We don't lose anything from banning the user and in fact, the user would be a pain in the ass to watch over in the future. Simple as that. What do we have to gain from keeping the user around exactly? БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 09:18, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
That's irrelevant. The user isn't a vandal and hasn't done anything to deserve an infinite block. If you can't just ignore the user then that's unfortunate for you. AceModerator 09:22, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Not to mention the user was blocked for ban evasion based on nothing. It was just an excuse Oxy came up with. If the user is evading a block then provide evidence of such. Also the uer hasn't vandalised anything so theres no reason for vabdal binning. AceModerator 09:23, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Linked to Conservapedia in the atheism article. Argues in bad faith. Combination is enough for a bin. This isn't contentious. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 09:26, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
I don't believe in laissez-faire moderation, pal. We're not babysitters for users that will certainly be problematic in some sort of fashion in the future, especially with blatantly bad faith actors, in which GiuocoPiano certainly. Every time I ban up a user who ended up getting paroled for some reason or another, they only served to get perma'd in their ass in the future, see Elvis is King. I'm a practical person. I nip problematic users in the bud like that, and it's clear as day that the user isn't here to help the wiki grow but to divert attention away with an agenda designed to troll others (especially with the way the user talks and how the user cites Conservapedia as a source). БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 09:26, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
That's not how it works pal. If you wanna rewrite the community standards then go ahead but this user hasn't done anything but be a vague, easily ignored, idiot. Not a vandal nor has done anything to cop an infinite ban. AceModerator 09:29, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Again, I'm not babysitting assholes who are not here to make the wiki grow. No one should. The only rationale you have is that it's against the rules, but that's about it. We are not keeping this user around, end of the story, because the user is a drain in attention by making provocative posts. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 09:32, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
You don't have to do anything, babysitting or otherwise. If you can't ignore the user then that's unfortunate for you but if you are going to vandal-bin or infinite ban then you need a better justification than "This user bothers me". AceModerator 09:35, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
You can choose to ignore the ban as well then. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 09:36, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
I have unblocked the user. With my mod hat on part of the mod remit is to bootstrap certain policies. One of which is blocking policy. If you disagree then take me to the mod page. AceModerator 09:37, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
I can't wait to see this user either leave or get inevitably reprimanded again in the future. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 09:38, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
I'm a mod and I disagree. Vandal bin. I don't have to monitor and patrol it as frequently, it can still post. Stop making it a big deal. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario! 09:40, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Links please. AceModerator 09:40, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Community Standards

Please review the community standards regarding long term blocks. AceModerator 10:06, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Again, I can't wait for the user to either leave or get inevitably reprimanded again with a ban (but this time as a slow, bureaucratic, coop initaited ban rather than a quick ban) in the future. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 10:11, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for adhering to the community standards. If you wish to change the community standards please present your suggestions to the mob. AceModerator 10:13, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Have fun keeping a trash user around to find himself get banned in the future regardless because your strict following of counterproductive rules. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 10:17, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
If you wish to change the community standards please present your suggestions to the mob. Stop fucking about. If you want to change the community standards then present your fucking ideas. They is what they is. AceModerator 10:19, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
As I said, have fun keeping a user who will find his comments reverted or troll-collapsed when a ban could have easily prevented unnecessary guff and remove bait to talk pages. But sure, uphold that because of "teh roolz said so." БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 10:22, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Well, yeah, that's why we have fucking rules. If you wish to change the rules present an alternative. They are what they are because of the work of hundreds of users before yourself and have lead to RW being what it is. You can't just ignore them because it is inconvenient for you. AceModerator 10:25, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Have fun dealing with a counterproductive troll who will find himself inevitably banned in the future. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 10:27, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
I don't have to deal with it. I'm an adult who is able to ignore things. And when the user actually does breach the comm standards, whether inevitable or not, I'll be the first person to ban them or vandal bin them. Regardless - we have community standards. You can't just breach them and breaching the community standards is a reason for a block in itself. You should be blocked for it. AceModerator 10:29, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Have fun block-warring with other sysops who disagree with you and have fun dragging out this issue more than it should. You seem to care a lot, lol. I'm not even contesting the block lol, but continue bitching about it on my talk page to get the last word. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 10:31, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for adhering to the community standards. Please be more careful in future. AceModerator 10:33, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Have fun contesting the block with LeftyGreenMario and letting a troll run rampant on the wiki. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 10:34, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
LGM is also bound by the community standards. AceModerator 10:35, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Have fun contesting the block with her on her talk page. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 10:35, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Please review the community standards regarding long blocks. LGM is also subject to the same rules. If you are having difficulty understanding the rules please raise it on the associated talkpage. AceModerator 10:37, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Have fun contesting the block with her on her talk page. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 10:35, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
I don't need to. LGM is subject to the same rules as everyone else. Mod or not. AceModerator 10:42, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Have fun contesting the block with her on her talk page. БaбyЛuigiOнФire🚓(T|C) 10:35, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

deleting stuff on talk pages

I loathe Ken's fallacies and puerile, clueless boasts as much as the next guy, but deleting somebody off of a talk page because you don't like what they said is not the RationalWiki way-{{SUBST:User:Brxbrx/sig}} 05:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Someone nominated you.

You've been nominated to the RationalMedia Foundation election. Please accept or decline here; if you accept, you may wish to campaign. Gunther1987 (talk) 14:19, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Don't suppress vandalism

Suppression should only be used in the event that page content is potentially libelous or contains inappropriate personal information. These two diffs are just vandalism, which yes, should be reverted, but shouldn't be suppressed. Next time, please check the text on RevisionDelete before suppressing edits. I've unsuppressed them. Techpriest (I am Alpharius! / Pencil.png / Tux icon.png / Shield.png) 12:49, 24 September 2020 (UTC)