Template talk:Category

Eek.

I'm not sure "best of" really constitutes bronze and silver articles. In fact, I'm almost certain it does not. Sterile (talk) 17:23, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Magic! (edit) I kept silver because most silver articles are pretty good reads, and we don't have a lot of gold. The FCP Foundation (talk/stalk) 01:01, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Not all categories have "best of" and "important articles"

...so those should be optional. In particular, this applies to all categories that use Template:Meta-cat.--ZooGuard (talk) 18:58, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Magic! See it in action at Category:Christian clergy. The FCP Foundation (talk/stalk) 21:54, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

"Important" parameter

Can we just get rid of it or have it properly formatted? It looks ugly when you input (what's with this pre markup?) and it's pretty pointless as we already categorize important articles through piping an asterisk or a blank space(i.e. we add [[Category:Alternative medicine|*]] that generates an asterisk category. Most of the time, it's blank, takes up space (it's not supposed to show by default but I still see it everywhere), and looks otherwise incomplete. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 17:55, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

I agree. Anyone else object? Christopher (talk) 20:44, 18 April 2021 (UTC)