Hello Trent

Jump to: navigation, search

What do you think about your website largely devolving into a grotesque smear site specialising in defamatory (especially sexual smears!) content against people interested in human variation, that depart from the Marxist zeitgeist? Has anyone sued you yet? What do your colleagues think about this? Regards

Wimbledon Flaneur (talk)10:49, 20 September 2019

Boo hoo, racism is bad and you haven't read a dictionary in your life. And you bother Trent with this petty drivel... For shame.

☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise17:11, 20 September 2019

Actually basing policies on retarded meaningless simplifications and delusions like "racism" is bad. Political philosophy and human genetics for dummies. Welcome to "Rationalwiki". You think that debunking Kent Hovind makes you a philosopher. Since Trent seems content to bother his ideological opponents (intellectual superiors) in such a disturbing and underhand manner, perhaps we should return the favor with the appropriate interest.

82.132.215.159 (talk)07:16, 21 September 2019

Wow, concern dutifully noted.

--It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario!(Mod)09:42, 21 September 2019
 

How could I possibly be a bother to my intellectual superiors? I am but a gnat to their giant intellect!

tmtoulouse23:52, 25 September 2019
 
 
Edited by another user.
Last edit: 07:29, 21 September 2019

I notice the editors here pounce on every ambiguous sexual comment made by people that study human variation, and present it in the most twisted way possible to defame the target (the criminal offence of false light). But we don't have an article about Epstein who literally raped underage sex slaves. I wonder if people here actually care about sexual abuse victims or whether they're just a bunch of dirty little liars and character assassins that can't argue their way out of a paper bag. Shame indeed.

82.132.215.159 (talk)07:25, 21 September 2019