Why was my article deleted?

You know, it's funny people making such a fuss about someone copying text they themselves wrote from CP, when Capturebot is filling this site up with image snapshots of it. It is fair use, but there are limits to fair use, and one of them is the extent of the copying. The extent of the copying by Capturebot is enormous, which calls the fair use status of it into question.

If Andy was going to sue or DCMA this site, why would he bother about Andries' article where he would be on very shaky legal grounds in doing so? Why wouldn't he just go after everything Capturebot has uploaded, he would be on much firmer legal ground there?

Yet I don't see all this fussing about the real legal problems of Capturebot, just the imagined legal problems of Andries' article.

Don't change the subject, not that I'm at all happy about having to talk with you. This has very little to do with copyright, to the extent CP even has copyright in any material on that site. I have no idea and as I said i don't care.

We can't use material submitted to CP because it's incompatible with our licensing scheme.

Go outside.

"This has very little to do with copyright".... "it's incompatible with our licensing scheme".

Don't you understand, that all licensing schemes are based on copyright ???!!!

Some licensing schemes are based around patents.

Seriously, just let this go...

Obviously I am talking about the one's relevant to Wikis, so your point is irrelevant.

Well, just in case, I'll let you know that when you're arguing with Nutty Roux, you actually are arguing with a lawyer.

So... like... buzz off.

Wow... a lawyer? I for one would never hire him.

I am sure he is deeply worried to have lost your respect.

God you're fucking thick. I'm finished talking with you now that I see you didn't actually read my posts but still want to endlessly yammer on. Go read the several posts I've already made here. They address your urgent JAQing off.