User talk:65.190.30.2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk: Tim Ball[edit]
As adorable as your little self-victimizing conservative John Birch Society-esque rant is, no one really gives a **** about your grossly misinformed opinion. Tomas Vilanch (talk) 08:42, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Like this moron for example. Why would a site that claims to be Rational care about opinions at all. Shouldn't it be clearly about facts and deductions? He doesn't care about my opinions, says he. Well case in point I don't care about opinions either, so let's discuss facts. I know it's a foreign concept to the great Rational Wiki Thinkers. — Unsigned, by: 65.190.30.2 / talk / contribs
- So I am blocked for excessive trolling, yet not a single person ever addressed the actual issue about Tim Ball and Mikey Mann, which was the failure of Mikey Mann to provide the regression data required to verify Tim Ball was in fact libelous. So the fact that Tim Ball was now awarded complete legal fees paid by Mikey Mann, I am sure is still considered a win by Mikey Mann from the Irrational Wiki standard. You people are pathetic. LeftGreenMario of course deleted all of it, because of his thin skin on actual facts. By his profile page he believes himself to be some Demi-God toiling away to block anyone he cannot provide a valid argument against. But hey it's a Rational website, Right??? Right??? Right??? Well it works for Rational Wiki Wonks. Just repeat till you believe. Could this site get and more pathetic. Actually I believe it can. Stay Tuned as Rational Wiki contorts, twists and tortures truth with poorly informed opinions that only collegiate failures can hope to attain. Yes it's a real hope they can reach that level. — Unsigned, by: 65.190.30.2 / talk
- I mean, it doesn't help your case that you argue on a pre-teen level. Also, For someone who claims to have read LGM's userpage, you seem to have missed that "he" is actually a she. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 18:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- I have merely reduced my level of discussion to the level of the intelligence on this site. Don't talk to me about Elementary school yard tactics, when this site owns that playground. Please excuse my gender faux pas as he is the natural choice when the gender is not known. I know it's old school, but hey I'm old. Case in point, you the Comrade, still are uninterested in discussing the facts of my original posts, where I was rudely attacked for using the same tactics that the OP of this site use. No matter, no one really takes this site serious. — Unsigned, by: 65.190.30.2 / talk / contribs
- Oh my god, just get on with it and marry RationalWiki. You've been singing about how lonely you were for nearly two years, time to Mann up, get the Ball rolling, and express your true feelings. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 20:52, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hahahaha! Says the suppressor of information. So are you running to Mann up and correct the Ball article? Of course not, because RW has no intention of facts or truth. Mann refused to provide the data ordered by the court that would have resolved the case once and for all, but he did not. Therefore the case was thrown out and Mann was ordered to pay for Ball's cost for bringing this case. So there you have it LGM, go ahead, you put the truth!!! You won't because that goes against the goal of this site to suppress truth in favor of nonsense.
- Oh my god, just get on with it and marry RationalWiki. You've been singing about how lonely you were for nearly two years, time to Mann up, get the Ball rolling, and express your true feelings. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 20:52, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
- I have merely reduced my level of discussion to the level of the intelligence on this site. Don't talk to me about Elementary school yard tactics, when this site owns that playground. Please excuse my gender faux pas as he is the natural choice when the gender is not known. I know it's old school, but hey I'm old. Case in point, you the Comrade, still are uninterested in discussing the facts of my original posts, where I was rudely attacked for using the same tactics that the OP of this site use. No matter, no one really takes this site serious. — Unsigned, by: 65.190.30.2 / talk / contribs
- I mean, it doesn't help your case that you argue on a pre-teen level. Also, For someone who claims to have read LGM's userpage, you seem to have missed that "he" is actually a she. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 18:02, 28 August 2019 (UTC)