User talk:88.98.241.40

Stop edit warring. If you have a problem with the revert, take it to the talk page. Thanks. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 18:23, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

I would argue that an edit should be taken to the talk page not a revert, as is procedure on Wikipedia. Thank you 88.98.241.40 (talk) 18:25, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia says that if someone reverts your edit, that person had a problem with your edit. You're not support to revert it back, which you're doing. You need to contact the person who reverted your edits instead, through talk page. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 18:27, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

I hate to break it to you (who are we kidding, I love saying this) but you aren't on Wikipedia anymore Dorothy. ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 11:45, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

You should know that we are not Wikipedia. Our missions consist of

1. Analyzing and refuting pseudoscience and the anti-science movement;
2. Documenting the full range of crank ideas;
3. Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism;
4. Analysis and criticism of how these subjects are handled in the media.

Nerd (talk) 11:57, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

It's a "common-sense" rule that applies to whatever wiki you're on. As long as you're on a Wiki that allows reverting edits, you should be aware of why would someone revert your edit. Wikipedia only spells out clearly about it, so I used it as a reference point. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 18:21, 6 August 2018 (UTC)