User talk:

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Stop edit warring. If you have a problem with the revert, take it to the talk page. Thanks. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario!(Mod) 18:23, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

I would argue that an edit should be taken to the talk page not a revert, as is procedure on Wikipedia. Thank you (talk) 18:25, 5 August 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia says that if someone reverts your edit, that person had a problem with your edit. You're not support to revert it back, which you're doing. You need to contact the person who reverted your edits instead, through talk page. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario!(Mod) 18:27, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
I hate to break it to you (who are we kidding, I love saying this) but you aren't on Wikipedia anymore Dorothy. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 11:45, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

You should know that we are not Wikipedia. Our missions consist of

  1. Analyzing and refuting pseudoscience and the anti-science movement;
  2. Documenting the full range of crank ideas;
  3. Explorations of authoritarianism and fundamentalism;
  4. Analysis and criticism of how these subjects are handled in the media.

Nerd (talk) 11:57, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

It's a "common-sense" rule that applies to whatever wiki you're on. As long as you're on a Wiki that allows reverting edits, you should be aware of why would someone revert your edit. Wikipedia only spells out clearly about it, so I used it as a reference point. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png LeftyGreenMario!(Mod) 18:21, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Information icon.svg This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it.

We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.