User talk:Aneris/RW Findings

You're intentionally ignoring the fact that Vordrak has multiple times stated that posting the full name of people on the internet is NOT doxxing. Also, his complaint about using Collingwood was due to his fear of spambots. But otherwise, nice article. Your inane rants are always cute. Typhoon (talk) 17:12, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Aneris using the term "regressive leftist" sans irony. When he does, I tune out everything else.---Mona- (talk) 17:33, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

You can offer a better term anytime, but I'm not interested in the denialist game that “a specific ideological corner” would not exist. It does, has specific tenets and is describable — and different from other flavours, including on the left. Also, you always show up to tell me that you are not interested — why don't you just ignore it then? ~ Aneris 15:04, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Why...

...do you care about this Nyberg nobody? I mean, if they're a pedophile and you have proof, have them arrested and be done with it. --Castaigne2 (talk) 00:22, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to the Slymepit. Where they obsessively stalk random internet people. Typhoon (talk) 06:55, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Because the proof isn't enough to get her convicted of a crime: bear in mind that expressing a sexual interest in [the group in which Nyberg expressed sexual interest] is not itself illegal. Plus, statute of limitations. There is, however, enough evidence against her to see that Ryulong's defence - "Nyberg didn't really write those messages that she admitted to writing" - is wrong. I think it is entirely reasonable to express concern about Ryulong and his supporters using the site to tell lies.

While I'm here, two questions for you:

• If Nyberg is a "nobody" and a "random Internet person", then why is the site so determined to portray her as some kind of saint, even if it involves flat-out lying about her?
• Why hasn't anyone here had Milo Yiannopoulos prosecuted? I mean, Timeline of Gamergate accuses him of a crime (namely, libel). Your defence of Nyberg can just as easily be applied to him. Tallulah (talk) 14:55, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Since I haven't written anything about Nyberg, I have no idea why this site has any stance on her at all. You might want to ask the person who's written the items. Although I would disagree with you; I don't see her portrayed as a saint here. As for Milo, you can't prosecute journalists successfully for libel. Too many 1st Amendment protections. See Popehat and other 1st Amendment legal sites for details.

I should also point out that if you don't have enough proof of pedophilia to get her convicted of a crime, then she is an alleged pedophile. I mean, if you're going to say that this or that person is a pedo-raper, you better have some To Catch A Predator type evidence available. There is no real statute of limitations on that type of crime. And if you are truly convinced she's committed a crime, why not got pedo-hunting for her all vigilante style like Perverted Justice used to? --Castaigne2 (talk) 15:33, 7 March 2016 (UTC)