There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Tallulah
Contractor (talk) 12:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. I don't suppose there's any chance I could have access to the Gamergate article, or at least its talk page? I'm interested in chipping in. Tallulah (talk) 15:38, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- That page should be accessible to you now. Alec Sanderson (talk) 15:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I'm still getting "view source" :/ Tallulah (talk) 13:00, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hmmm. Just noticed this. The article and its talk page are limited to editing by "autoconfirmed" users, which includes you. If you still can't edit it, RationalWiki:Technical support is the place to go. Can't be more help than that, and sorry about the late response. Alec Sanderson (talk) 16:28, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Tallulah's autoconfirmed and autopatrolled. Should be good. FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 16:33, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hmmm. Just noticed this. The article and its talk page are limited to editing by "autoconfirmed" users, which includes you. If you still can't edit it, RationalWiki:Technical support is the place to go. Can't be more help than that, and sorry about the late response. Alec Sanderson (talk) 16:28, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- I'm afraid I'm still getting "view source" :/ Tallulah (talk) 13:00, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
- That page should be accessible to you now. Alec Sanderson (talk) 15:47, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
srhbutts[edit]
Stop repeating shit from Breitbart's hitpieces on her.—Ryulong (talk) 03:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
*Yawn*[edit]
You're not gonna fool anyone with your whitewashing. Try to be more critical of the stuff you're fed by Milo. Typhoon (talk) 19:27, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
- Where to begin? I could point out that, when I first raised concerns about how RW was presenting Nyberg, multiple editors agreed with me - so clearly there are people who are fine with my "whitewashing" (or, as it's otherwise known, "accurate reporting of the facts"). I could also point out that, while you're trying to portray me as some kind of Milo Yiannopoulos lapdog, my very first Gamergate-related addition to this site was a criticism of Milo Yiannopoulos. But at the end of the day, I think the crucial point here is that your comment makes absolutely no effort to debunk a single one of my edits. Tallulah (talk) 11:36, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
Sysop[edit]
You are now a sysop. That means that you can restore deleted articles and edit protected pages (such as the Gamergate talk pages - no way can you make those articles any worse than they already are...) Balaam (talk) 20:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
- I should add, click here for a quick primer on how to use the sysop tools. Congrats! *confetti* ℕoir LeSable (talk) 20:20, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Heads up[edit]
I've added an article you created to the Articles for deletion. --Cosmikdebris (talk) 20:37, 19 January 2016 (UTC)