User talk:Arall
|
Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, Arall.
This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives. Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you. If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be. |
Please check your grammar the next time you make an edit.--JorisEnter (talk) 14:31, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- I am not a native English speaker, but you can correct my grammar and keeping the ideas...--Arall (talk) 14:50, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- It's not up to me to correct your English - if you want to contribute to an English website, you should make sure that your have a good understanding of the language. I am not a native speaker either, yet my contributions aren't full of blatant mistakes in grammar and spelling. If you want to add something but don't know how to phrase it, you can of course always ask it on the relevant talk page.--JorisEnter (talk) 15:23, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Saying you can correct me if you see some mistakes does not mean you are obliged to do it. Also You can select what to discard if you want to discard instead of discarding everything (even proper English edits). But again instead of discarding stuff let other people correct it (this is how a wiki works after all). Why do you speak/boast about your level of English, it is irrelevant. And I have a good understanding of English (writing skills is not the same as reading/listening skills).--Arall (talk) 15:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- The fact of the matter is simple. Additions that are grammatical nightmares will be reverted. That is, after all, how a wiki works. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 16:44, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Saying you can correct me if you see some mistakes does not mean you are obliged to do it. Also You can select what to discard if you want to discard instead of discarding everything (even proper English edits). But again instead of discarding stuff let other people correct it (this is how a wiki works after all). Why do you speak/boast about your level of English, it is irrelevant. And I have a good understanding of English (writing skills is not the same as reading/listening skills).--Arall (talk) 15:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- It's not up to me to correct your English - if you want to contribute to an English website, you should make sure that your have a good understanding of the language. I am not a native speaker either, yet my contributions aren't full of blatant mistakes in grammar and spelling. If you want to add something but don't know how to phrase it, you can of course always ask it on the relevant talk page.--JorisEnter (talk) 15:23, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Also[edit]
If you have a problem with the page on veganism, please take it to the talk page, rather than adding all those random comments.--JorisEnter (talk) 14:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- If you have a problem with my not random comments back up by science you can take it to the talk conversation or correct it. because I clearly made some point for any skeptics to see it.--Arall (talk) 14:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Joris[edit]
His edits are fine. Fight them the talkpage, not by reverting. Herr FüzzyCätPötätö (talk/stalk) 17:02, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Alkaline diet[edit]
Hi Arall, great that you made an effort to source your new additions to Alkaline diet. (I'm not sure whether these particular studies are the best representations of the prevailing science on this subject - maybe other users know better). But in any case, please try to proof-read and correct your grammar, spacing, capitalisation etc. as there are still quite a lot of errors in what you have written. Have a read of Help:Mistakes and Help:Manual_of_style. Thanks, --Yisfidri (talk) 19:55, 17 August 2016 (UTC)