There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staffâwe are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Concerned
If you're going to change a page[edit]
Maybe don't make changes that are directly contradicted by the citation that follow them. This is a magic hint from me to you to slightly lower your chances of getting reverted. ikanreed đBleat at me 17:26, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Seriously, though[edit]
You're really really not fooling anyone. We know what you're about. There was a reason why your "clever" "call out" of a "satirist" was reverted despite the factual accuracy of the "concern". (also your sock shouldn't use the same syntax and formatting of posts on the same subject as your main account) ikanreed đBleat at me 18:42, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Banned for three days[edit]
I told you to stop with the baseless accusations. You continued making the accusations. You get a ban. I made it clear. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 21:26, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
3 months in the slot[edit]
Just a few days ago you were told, but you didn't take the message. You're blocked for three months. Naturally my call is subject to review. --MtDBogan 08:17, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
Blocked[edit]
If you want to email me about your latest weird race theories or how you hate my guts that's cool, but really you should give this a rest. "claims to hate this place but is obsessed with it and posts here everyday", sound familiar? You wrote it yourself. â Dysk (contribs) 01:09, 23 March 2019 (UTC)