There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:JonCGerald
Hi there. Thanks for joining RationalWiki. Please, pull up a dyslexic and enjoy your stay here. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 08:13, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
Whistleblowers[edit]
Excellent job! Scream!! (talk) 10:07, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! JonCGerald (talk) 6:51, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Stein[edit]
Thanks for clarifying that section of the article; it's her running mate who appears to think that way, not Stein herself. Sir ℱ℧ℤℤϒℂᗩℑᑭƠℑᗩℑƠ (talk/stalk) 21:23, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Manufactroversy[edit]
Hello. 1) Why'd you reinstate the weird indent? 2) Instead of utter fabrication, as the page states, I mistook the term as simple exaggeration. Under the stated definition, removing the emails entry does indeed make sense. Why write off the DNC hack as a conspiracy though? That's a strong claim. Several government agencies and third party experts agreed on it. Thanks B) talk 03:46, 24 October 2016 (UTC)