There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Mythbuster
What is your agenda? Lyra § talk 02:38, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
- From the homepage : "We welcome contributors,and we encourage those who disagree with us to register and engage in a constructive dialogue." Iam offering constructive additions on a subject I have studied.Mythbuster 02:42, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
Go nuts, my man. Make us proud. --Robledo 17:08, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
Apologies for what I did to your userpage. It's just that red link was an eyesore. Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 20:42, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
This is a little orange message to promote goodwill. Basically because I'm feeling a bit hippy at the moment.:-) --Bobbing up 13:01, 29 June 2008 (EDT)
welcome back[edit]
You are now a sysop. Enjoy RatMaster háblame 02:51, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
don't be stupid about Shakespeare[edit]
Your activity on the Shakespeare authorship article has been noted, and as a disinterested admin who came across the saloon bar discussion, I am asking you to take your own advice and leave the page alone. We don't care to legitimize fringe theories here. EVDebs (talk) 19:49, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
- Problem is, the facts are being misquoted. And it's not a conspiracy theory. That's just incorrect, based on our own definition of the word. The history is also all wrong. And instead of an amusing write up, it's just a bunch of name calling. — Unsigned, by: Mythbuster / talk / contribs