User talk:Stabby the Misanthrope/Flufferbuffer

Won't work, they won't delete those pages no matter how crazy the views get. The reason they are in the millions is because of OSM and others. tmtoulouse 01:03, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Who or what was OSM? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:06, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Weren't they deleted before, during the first great page-bump operation which filled Conservapedia's top ten with articles about homosexuality? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:08, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Operation Smoke and Mirrors, it was basically when we bumped all the homosexuality articles and up to make them look bad, as well as a few others to negate the "wow look at our views" mentality. We made the view RIDICULOUS in number. They just claim they are "real." They only delete "silly" bumps, like goat. tmtoulouse 01:08, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

They deleted a lot of them, but the big three they won't delete. tmtoulouse 01:09, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

I agree with Trent. In fact, I've had this idea before, and reached the same conclusion. (PS: Isn't my new name divine?) Pink_{(Astronomy Domine)} 01:11, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Oddly, I find your new name matches your personality. Don't ask me why. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:21, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

The way you would do it is get deleting rights and pull a Samwell. tmtoulouse 01:14, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Yep. It really irritates me that our past Samwells didn't think of that :( Pink_{(Astronomy Domine)} 01:16, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Eh, blocking rights are now easy to get, deletion rights not so easy. It would be a long haul, you would need to convince Andy that it makes since to pull deletion rights as a separate right like blocking. Basically a whole lot of "new page" vandalism over time he should be willing to do his "powers of a sysops but not the rights" thing he does with blocking with deletion as well. tmtoulouse 01:18, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

I consider our past Samwells to be incredibly stupid. I mean, what the frack does blocking/unblocking Conservapedians do? It fails to damage the pride of Conservapedia, which is all they have! They could've quartered CP's view counts. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:25, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Unfortunately, I do not have the diligence necessary to obtain sysopship on Conservapedia. I have a hard enough time staying up in the ranks here. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:21, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Our past Samwells got to block rights before blocking sysops (who can just unblock themselves) and unblocking cabal members who were reblocked. To delete you need sysop rights. The granddaddy of them all would be getting the Nuke option then you can delete ever article edited by a particular user in one go. Take out Andy, Ken, and Ed's and you would delete more than half the site in one go. But the one I would like is bureaucrat you could slowly let the parodist take over that way. $\approx$$\pi$ _Mowse 01:22, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Here is another approach, Conservative is likely to delete articles that go over his pet articles in page views, so if you started bumping all the articles below his pets to above they will get reset, but as you said that will take a long time to get as much of an effect. tmtoulouse 01:23, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Hm. I suppose I should retarget my clickbot off of Atheism, then, huh? *Sigh* I'd already raised it by about half a million. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 01:29, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Well there is something to be said for click boting one of his pet articles. Just to see if there is a point where they figure "enough is enough." I don't think there is, but the more ridiculous the page total is the more smaller the "signal to noise" ratio for them to trumpet their views. tmtoulouse 01:32, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

There is not really much point in clicking Ken's pet articles as he can't hear anything but his own thoughts (look at TWIGO and the way he latches on to about two words in any posting ignoring the other 100 or so). He will conveniently ignore the click bot bit (the same way he was boasting about the site statistics during the Lenski affair when the site was over run by people laughing at them) and think he is making some big impact. (Is he aware that Wikipedia get about 1000 3,931.65 times more traffic then CP?) $\approx$$\pi$ _Mowse 01:44, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

I calculated that deleting the forty-seven articles following the big three ("Atheism", "Main Page", and "Homosexuality") would shave approximately 9.25 million hits off the record, which is over 15% of Conservapedia's total view count. Today's targets: "India" and "Achilles". Wish me luck! : ) Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 02:02, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Can you believe that at one point, I had my sights set on cutting CP's total view count by half? Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 02:02, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

How do you do it by the way? $\approx$$\pi$ _Mowse 02:04, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Well, see, I sit here in front of my computer 24/7, and click the refresh button really fast. : ) Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 02:05, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

You asked for participants, if you are going to try to be funny I will just go back to doing my real life work instead. $\approx$$\pi$ _Mowse 02:15, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Ah, I'm sorry. I didn't realize you were offering to help. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 02:21, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Genghis Khant told me how to do it. He considers it a trade secret, so I won't share it on-wiki—I'll email you. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 02:21, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Cheers. $\approx$$\pi$ _Mowse 02:22, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Hmmm we cant have an evil scheme without having a weather machine to hold the world hostage with. Ace McWicked^{Substansive comments only} 02:52, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

That is all well and good but we need a hollow volcano to start with. Have you seen the prices they go for these days? We may need another fund-raiser. $\approx$$\pi$ _Mowse 02:56, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Hollow volcano you say? I actually think there might be one round the corner from my house. I'll check it while go recruit for a hideous and gargantuan lackey to carry out tasks such carrying unconcious bodies and smashing through brick walls. Ace McWicked^{Substansive comments only} 03:02, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

I think I found the perfect man for us, Ace—his name is "Karajou" and he claims to be from something called "Conservapedia". But he does fit the bill, being gargantuan (of ego) and hideous. : ) Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 03:07, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

And the name "karajou" certainly sounds henchman like. I can envision him grunting "karajou must crush" Ace McWicked^{Substansive comments only} 03:11, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

what is this doing on RW?

You are essentially outlining an attack on another website here. Cute idea that's been around for a while in various guises, but not really something RW wants to host. ħuman 05:00, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Wait—stop me if you heard this one! Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 05:04, 22 September 2008 (EDT)

Three quick things

1. Why would they do what you want them to do? No matter the suspicion aspect of it, your actions would be exactly what they wanted, right (sorry for the confusion, I'm trying to be vague)?
2. Very clever way of revealing the plan, but doesn't this talk page kinda give it away? Maybe it should be deleted, too?
3. I think the most recent OSMish thing was accepted because it was funny. I'm not sure everyone will be as on board for this proposal. My opinion: eh, it's a wiki; knock yourself out. Going to bed now, so I'll check back later tomorrow. Goodnight and good luck! ;-) --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 05:47, 22 September 2008 (EDT)