User talk:Arcan

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Arcan!

Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards.

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

Are you a sock of Cracker, Human, or Bohdan?--PalMD-Did that sound a little harsh? 22:47, 5 February 2008 (EST)

No, I'm not, and no, it didn't.  :-) -Arcan 00:43, 6 February 2008 (EST)

Teacher[edit]

Your a teacher? I have genuine respect for you now. --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 03:09, 6 March 2008 (EST)

Haha, well, let's hold off until I actually do something to earn that respect. Also, I'm not a teacher yet. One has to be employed to hold that title. While we're at it, and it might just be me being dense to humor, but you do realize what you did wrong there, yes? Arcan 03:41, 6 March 2008 (EST)
No, I think I did do something wrong. I am but an amateur grammar Nazi.  : ) --Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 12:52, 6 March 2008 (EST)

Not petty at all![edit]

That's what I get for writing quotes by hand instead of copypasting them! Thanks for fixing :) --Sid 14:47, 23 March 2008 (EDT)

Haha, no problem. I really liked the entry, and just thought the poor grammar to be an absurd cherry on the absurd sunday. Arcan 14:49, 23 March 2008 (EDT)

sig test[edit]

just testing --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 13:03, 26 March 2008 (EDT)

ok, trying again... --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 13:06, 26 March 2008 (EDT) Yay!

Coverstory issues[edit]

We are trying to make the inclusions teh more awesome. Sadly, we have made teh misteaks along the way. Please to kindly hang on while we unmeak our errors and meak things perfect. I'd link to where we are working on this, but I forgot the darn page! Probably one of the "coverstory" talk pages, but who knows? In the meantime, thanks for taking out the trash. humanUser talk:Human 01:20, 16 April 2008 (EDT)

Ok, I don't think I understood any of that... --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 01:22, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
Alright, just saw the talk page for the Behe article, so I'm guessing this is in reference to that, but I think I'm still confused. Are you saying it was good that I commented? Bad? I didn't mean to offend, and I hope it wasn't taken that way. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 01:25, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
What you did was fine. The "noinclude" was a so-far-failing attempt to specify more precisely in each cover story what gets transcluded to the main page. humanUser talk:Human 13:57, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
Ah, ok, good. I thought I'd screwed something up or made some faux pas. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 13:59, 16 April 2008 (EDT)
Oh wait! I was just thinking - the Behe article didn't have the noinclude. Could that have been the problem? --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 14:01, 16 April 2008 (EDT)

English Teacher[edit]

Just saw you say that you are an English teacher. A real one or TEFL like me?--Bobbing up 10:54, 24 May 2008 (EDT)

I'm not sure what TEFL means (I'm guessing English as a Foreign Language, but I'm not sure). I'm actually a certified secondary (67th-12th) English teacher. However, this is a recent development (as of the beginning of this year) so I'm still unemployed, but a teacher nonetheless. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 11:12, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
Yes, TEFL is Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Most expatriate English teachers have some form of TEFL qualification - or should have one. Good luck looking for work.  :-) --Bobbing up 11:17, 24 May 2008 (EDT)


Grammarnazi.svg
This user is a Grammar Nazi. Heil Stickler!
Wazza (Not Wazzock, Wazza)Approach the Presence 11:22, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
Haha, so you've not ready any of my contribs, have you? I'm very much a "descriptivist." I only get uppity about grammar etc. in formal situations - and I made that very clear to my students as well. It's kinda asinine to work about SWE in informal communication. Oh, and I cuss like a sailor. I don't even realize when I'm doing it (though I filter it the classroom). I'm very much not the typical English teacher. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 11:29, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
Consider a career in TELF, you sound like a perfect match for the ne'er-do-wells, alcoholics, and various types of escapee who seem to end up in teh profession overseas.  :-) --Bobbing up 11:36, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
I'm going to take that as a compliment, whether you meant it that way or not ;-) Honestly though, I love teaching kids, and the "rogue" element of my style really seems to work well. It's so great to basically watch their minds form (at the 7th grade level) and then serve as a guide when their minds are kinda taking their first steps (at the upper grades). To help in that process and encourage it and to know that you're a part of it, it is literally awesome. I'm not ready to give up the traditional classroom yet. I was thinking of doing this Japanese program that my friend applied to, but I didn't think I was quite ready for that. Eventually, maybe :-) --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 11:52, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
Good luck with that then.  :-) I used to like kids - till I had to teach them. On the other hand the difficult sods are aged 13+ - before that age they they all want to be your friend, which is sort of sweet.--Bobbing up 11:58, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
Yeah, that's about the age that I get them, 12-13 and up. And some of them are monsters, most definitely. I guess I'm just that crazy :-) --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 12:01, 24 May 2008 (EDT)
I guess that everybody is different. Now I only teach adults.--Bobbing up 13:29, 24 May 2008 (EDT)

an EXTREMELY awkward question[edit]

Is it only coincidence that your screen name is the almost same as that of Arkan, the notorious mass-murderer and leader of a nasty Serbian paramilitary group during the Bosnian war? PFoster 12:41, 10 June 2008 (EDT)

Wow, yeah, the awkardomer is off the charts. Considering I'd never heard of Arkan, yes, it is a total coincidence. "Arcan" is actually an abbreviaion. Sometimes I go by "ArcanRed," which is two abbreviations. Abbreviations of what, though, is a mystery I keep to myself. So no, I'm not glorifying any mass-murderers, etc. It's mainly just a nonsense word. But thanks for asking, I think... --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 14:07, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
Hey Arcan - sorry if the question freaked you out - it's just that I did a lot of work on Serb nationalism and the breakup of Jugoslavia in my undergrad, so I had to ask. I actually figured it would make no sense for a Serb apologist to be posting here, but I had to ask. PeacePFoster 21:37, 10 June 2008 (EDT)
No problem. I didn't really freak me out so much as it was totally out of left field for me. I'd never heard of Arkan. You just gave me a bit of homework.  ;-) --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 10:09, 11 June 2008 (EDT)

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for going through all those links! Only Crocodite could do something that slimey. I really hope PJR turns up and restores the history, or else we've lost all our lulz :( <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>That's why I have this doomed expression. You haven't noticed my doomed expression. 22:23, 11 June 2008 (EDT)

If it were just to burn the evidence, I think think PJR might come to our rescue (indirectly, of course), but the "vulgar link" will likely keep PJR away. Most of the best WIGOs (10+) didn't link to the Mainpage Talk, so they're in the clear. The only 10+ one I couldn't fix was "Words can't express the stupid." There's just far too much stupid to know what the reference was to. Thanks for the thanks. ;-) --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 22:31, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
Thanks for the thanks for the thanks! We could be here some time. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>That's why I have this doomed expression. You haven't noticed my doomed expression. 22:34, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
That was the one that goes more or less like this:
Our heroes are in the middle of a debate (about gun control, I think), after a barrage of useless comments, one contender tries to put some organization.
  • Some Guy: I've made this new section for people in the debate to show your empirical evidence that supports your case.
  • Andy: Why evidence? Surely pure logic is enough.
NightFlareStill doesn't have a RWW article. 23:43, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
Yes you do, whiner ;) ħumanUser talk:Human 02:38, 12 June 2008 (EDT)
I think I remember that one, though the Mainpage Talk archives all start to sound alike after a while. I'll let you add that one, if you like. I know, I know, I'm so generous. ;-) Oh, and Jellyfish, if you're still watching, thanks for the thanks for the thanks. Of course, I demand last wordism, being the filthy liberal that I am. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 00:04, 12 June 2008 (EDT)
I'm always watching, Archy, and I demand that you cease your lastwordism. This isn't Wikipedia! We don't allow liberals to say what they like. Therefore -- thanks for the thanks for the thanks for the thanks.
Kowardjou has been instructed to firebomb you if you try to reply :) <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>That's why I have this doomed expression. You haven't noticed my doomed expression. 00:11, 12 June 2008 (EDT)
Right, like that could ever- OH MY GOD WHAT'S THAT IN THE SKY! NOOOO! --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 01:28, 12 June 2008 (EDT)
That's Crockospite, actually. He has way too much time on his hands. <font=""; face="Comic Sans MS">Jellyfish!</font>That's why I have this doomed expression. You haven't noticed my doomed expression. 01:35, 12 June 2008 (EDT)

Three Pointzes[edit]

This user has officially earned THREE POINTZES for correctly identifying the key in the challenge at talk:WIGO CP. Congratulations, and pleez to spend them not awl in teh saim plaice. And pleez also to yuze them for gud and not ebil. ħumanUser talk:Human 23:42, 14 June 2008 (EDT)

Let's see, do you want the glow-in-the-dark fake vampire teeth, or the koosh ball key-chain? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 00:07, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
No way, I'm sooo saving up for the stuff on the wall! --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 00:17, 15 June 2008 (EDT)
Good plan, Arcan. The bigger prizes are so worth saving up for. Now it's time for the rigged basketball toss... ħumanUser talk:Human 00:40, 15 June 2008 (EDT)

Seven or Eight Pointzes!!![edit]

For being a Lert in teh middlez of the night and cranking back on wandalism. Thanks, Arcan. You were perfect. ħumanUser talk:Human 03:19, 28 June 2008 (EDT)

Public education[edit]

I've just kicked off the article public education (which I'm surprised we already didn't have). I feel it has the potential to become something truly great, as it touches upon so many aspects of our mission (which may not be readily apparent, given its magnificently cruddy form at the moment). Being a public school teacher, I would greatly appreciate any input you have to offer. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 06:34, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

That's more like it. 06:36, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
Are you saying my desperate begging for help is usually lacking? Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 06:39, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
Yeah :P 06:41, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
It's usully more along the lines of "BAAAWWWWW, I phail, plz hlp me!" (Paraphrasing slightly for humorous effect, of course.) --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 06:44, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
I'll help out however I can.  :-) --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 21:03, 2 July 2008 (EDT)
Ah, thank you. Star of David.png Radioactive afikomen Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments. 22:39, 2 July 2008 (EDT)

You = sysop[edit]

Knock yourself out! 14:36, 24 July 2008 (EDT)

Thanks! Wow, givin' 'em out like candy, haha. Well, I solemnly pledge that this will probably not change anything, considering I have no idea what all these new buttons etc. do. I mean, I can kinda guess what "lock" and "vaporise" are, but I think I'll be too worried about causing some sort of catastrophic system failure to use them. Still, thanks! --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 15:01, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
Thanks for the thanks. (I love doing this)
Check out the guide for the info. 15:14, 24 July 2008 (EDT)
No need to worry, Arcan, I more or less set the lowest possible standard for the current batch of demotions already. By comparison, your ability to cause problems should be minimal. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 15:26, 24 July 2008 (EDT)

RWV[edit]

Good idea. ~ Gloom(is never asleep) 18:12, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

I've got it as a toolbar button. SusanG  ContribsTalk 18:14, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
Really? Where? ~ Gloom(is never asleep) 18:16, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
(points→) Here. SusanG  ContribsTalk 18:19, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
Sigh...
Screenshot? ~ Gloom(is never asleep) 18:21, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
I'll wager a guess that she put it in the browser toolbar. --AKjeldsenCum dissensie 18:29, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
You'd win. SS coming up - don't hold yer bref - (don't like GIMP enuff yet) SusanG  ContribsTalk 18:35, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
Image:SS02.gif There. SusanG  ContribsTalk 18:37, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
Nice. I thought you meant it was on the navigation panel in RW somehow. I apoly guise.~ Gloom(is never asleep) 18:40, 26 July 2008 (EDT)
Could be put there. SusanG  ContribsTalk 18:42, 26 July 2008 (EDT)

Diablo[edit]

So like "block" would be a frost mage skill right? Ready for Diablo 3? tmtoulouse oppress 23:20, 25 August 2008 (EDT)

I will be ready for it, when it eventually comes out (and I even like the art style). Blizzard has so many other things in the queue, though. I'm not holding my breath for it. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 23:22, 25 August 2008 (EDT)
Like what? Wraith of the Lich King? Who cares about that? Really? So your not one of the people crying that its too colorful and not "gothic" enough? tmtoulouse oppress 23:25, 25 August 2008 (EDT)
They've also got Starcraft 2 coming up, and while these may or may not be games I'm looking forward to, I doubt Blizzard is going to release them all that close to one another. And yes, I do not support the Necromartyr and his ilk. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 23:30, 25 August 2008 (EDT)
Oh yea Starcraft 2.......forgot about that........ tmtoulouse oppress 23:41, 25 August 2008 (EDT)
Yeah, and they won't want to step on those toes. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 23:43, 25 August 2008 (EDT)
Meh, I like most of what they put out...then again I like most computer games. What I am really excited about though is Spore. tmtoulouse oppress 23:48, 25 August 2008 (EDT)
I've never really gotten into pure strategy games, be they TBS or RTS, though civ games (but not Civ proper) do draw me in. Blizzardwise, I did get sucked into Diablo II and WoW for a while each. I'm tentatively excited for Spore - I'm worried that the parts won't connect properly (e.g. what you do in the single-cell stage won't carry over much into the tribe stage, and so on), and that's only exasperated by the fact that you can jump in at any stage. Still, though, it's Will Wright, and he tends to deliver on his promises. If it were Peter Molyneux, then I'd be concerned.
I haven't followed the details enough, I enjoyed the "creature creator" that came out and have seen vids and what not. I am looking forward to it. Since I um procure most my video games from torrents my standards are lower than if I paid $50. tmtoulouse oppress 00:02, 26 August 2008 (EDT)
Haha, I understand. I've been trying to get away from the pirate life (very recently, as in after Assassin's Creed), which means that I mostly play free/cheap games and only dole out money when I can be sure I'll enjoy it, like the Orange Box, Mass Effect, and most recently, Beyond Good and Evil (from Steam). --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 00:06, 26 August 2008 (EDT)
I justify my pirate life by virtue that if I didn't download it I wouldn't buy it. My graduate student stipend doesn't support gaming, or movies for that matter. Yea thats my justification. So Mass Effect any good? I am 75% of my way there...... tmtoulouse oppress 00:41, 26 August 2008 (EDT)
I definitely understand - "just-out-of-college-and-still-unemployed" doesn't support much either. As for Mass Effect, I'm nearly finished it, and I'm actually sad about that, because I'd like to keep playing it. I absolutely loved it. However, the "Citadel" section (near the beginning of the game) is dull as hell. Very little story or exposition, no action whatsoever, not-quite-even-fetch-quest quests, etc. Once past that, the game pick up fantastically. The driving sections are rubbish until you get used to them, but I really enjoyed the combat and "diplomacy" bits. Then again, KOTOR is pretty much my favorite game ever, and I liked Jade Empire as well, so take that as you will. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 00:49, 26 August 2008 (EDT)
Any game I really support I will usually buy, I have even gone out and purchased games I have pirated and really liked. I see it as a form of voting. I will probably buy Spore, as well as Diablo III (I am a sucker for the hack and slash, being able to play a game only by pointing and clicking really revs up those dopamine cells). I might even take a look at the Warcraft expansion but that is dangerous, I dumped more time than I could afford when I played. Anyway, I have been lately messing with Titan's Quest while I wait for Mass Effect to download. I remember Beyond Good and Evil but I never went far with it. I have Overlord, S.t.a.l.k.e.r, and a few others all sitting in the sorta liked but didnt really catch on category. I am just rambling I will stop :). tmtoulouse oppress 00:56, 26 August 2008 (EDT)

<- I'll probably buy Spore, and I certainly hope to have a job/money by the time Diablo III comes out. I haven't played Titan's Quest. For some reason it was totally off my radar when it first came out, and every time I remember it I'm in the middle of something else. BG&E is another of my favorites, but I like platformers. Still, it's wholly unique in what it does. I actually finished Overlord; it's fun, but oddly unpolished at times. It's a lot like a cross between Pikmin and Fable, whose sequel I'm also excited for (even though Molyneux always overpromises), with voice actors lifted directly from the latter. S.t.a.l.k.e.r. was very good, but overall I think I respected and appreciated it more than I liked it, if that made any sense. I'm sure I'll try the sequel eventually (even though I might have to return to my old ways to try it). Ok, now I'm rambling. Haha. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 08:56, 26 August 2008 (EDT)

Goatspeed![edit]

Thanks for that reversion to my user page. Seriously, thank you. =) Javasca₧ Banhammer, Renamer, and Goat

Haha, you would have gotten it soon. I just refreshed at the right time.  :-) --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 23:19, 15 September 2008 (EDT)
Thanks for fixing my user page.--Bobbing up 13:58, 20 October 2008 (EDT)
No problem :-) --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 14:32, 20 October 2008 (EDT)
Ditto! Thanks. --PsyGremlinWhut? 17:02, 20 October 2008 (EDT)

Sorry...[edit]

I accidentally reverted your reversion of a vandal's work. I just reverted my reversion of your reversion, but I thought you might want to know. (I still don't quite know how to use wikis very well...) A Writer of Vaudevilles 22:50, 18 November 2008 (EST)

Haha, I saw that, but I didn't think anything of it. The nice thing about wikis is that nearly anything that can be broken can be easily unbroken, so don't worry about it :-) --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 22:58, 18 November 2008 (EST)

Barnstar[edit]

[Award removed]

Thanks for the thought, but any award given to Andrew Usher Fall Over isn't one I'd like to get. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 20:58, 12 December 2008 (EST)

Thanks[edit]

I was thinking about removing that from the WIGO as well, but was a bit too hesitant, I guess. --Kels 18:13, 25 December 2008 (EST)

Haha, no problem :-) --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 18:29, 25 December 2008 (EST)

Thanks 2[edit]

Cheers for cleaning up all that page move vandalism. - User \scriptstyle-i\ln(-1) 23:25, 2 January 2009 (EST)

Haha, no problem --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 23:28, 2 January 2009 (EST)

Teaching granny to suck eggs?[edit]

If you open the "move" log you can just click "revert" & move the associated "talk" by clicking the box. Toast 23:28, 2 January 2009 (EST)

Four things: 1. Huh? 2. Ah, I didn't know about the move log thing 3. I knew about the check box, but somehow, I unchecked it for the last move 4. Thanks, I think  :-) --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 23:31, 2 January 2009 (EST)

Thanks 3[edit]

Ah thanks for correcting my WIGO, I was wondering what the problem was. --GTac 11:06, 20 January 2009 (EST)

Haha, no problem. Honestly, after I copy/pasted the edit comment, I was worried it would look like I was shouting, instead of just quoting. Glad to help, and glad to hear no offense was taken! --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 11:17, 20 January 2009 (EST)

Rolled you back in the Saloon...[edit]

...sorry, my bad, was trying to fix CUR's accidental removal of a comment...TheoryOfPractice 22:06, 21 January 2009 (EST)

Wasn't removing a comment. I was trying to get my paragraph after an edit conflict. God Darwin, I hate those things! --"ConservapediaUndergroundDiode'is a puerile idiot' 22:09, 21 January 2009 (EST)

I SAID "accidental..."TheoryOfPractice 22:11, 21 January 2009 (EST)

No problem, I figured out what was going on and just fixed it :-) --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 22:10, 21 January 2009 (EST)

Extra WIGO warning[edit]

Yeah, it's probably not necessary. I knew it was a matter of time before I got caught with my IPants down.

thanks![edit]

Thanks for improving my part when trying to post the latest regarding to an MSNBC poll in Conservapedia:What is going on at CP? I'm going to "infiltrate" into Conservapedia by creating a fake account to expose their extreme homophobia. I remembered about a year ago, I tried to question their homophobia in their site. Obviously, they banned me for it. Now for some nice revenge, read more here. --Dark Paladin X 13:24, 22 April 2009 (EDT)

I'm not sure if you're watching this page, but I'd advise against your plan. We already know they're homophobic. Ken's Summa Homosexualita proves that. I'm not sure what you "revenge" would be, and normally I'm all for justice and/or vengeance, but there's no slight to avenge here. They blocked you from a place that would only cause you stress. Don't stoop to their level. Be better than they are. Living well is the best revenge. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 15:04, 22 April 2009 (EDT)

Wigo "Seemingly"[edit]

Weasel wordsn- Nice. Don't let the truth spoil a good story. Tricksy 09:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Your intentions and your actions didn't line up there. Whatever you meant to say, to everyone else it looked like you called him a troll. So, as someone not personally involved in that WIGO, "seemingly" is entirely accurate in that case. It reports what you said (not to mention links to exactly what you said) without claiming to know what you intended, but doesn't lose the interpretation that most people looking at your post would glean. Even the person you were talking about misunderstood you. There is an update in the same WIGO about your clarification, so your side of the story is told. As it is, you're trying to revise a story after it happened about which you literally cannot be objective, because you were not just an active participant, but the focus of it.
BTW - Thanks for the accusation. Maybe if you didn't imply I was a liar, I'd be less hostile. And I really appreciate you making this personal, rather than bringing it up on the talk page. Classy. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 19:05, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
"Seemingly": fair enough I suppose. That's why I re-cast it, but "seemingly" is an oft-use weasel word employed to make statements that would otherwise be taken as dishonest. I accept that this is not what you were doing. In my post above, I used a cliche to sum up my perception of WIGO aSK lately. I apologise for any accusation that you were being dishonest. I stress though, that I absolutely was talking about Gulik's post and not Gulik personally. As to Gulik's misunderstanding, I have already addressed that at aSK. Actually the focus of the WIGO was Gulik's weird and humourous implication that photos taken by YEC's aren't reliable, but someone else revised the story. Apparently as a participant in the thread, I should not have WIGOed it, but followed the accepted practice of posting it into talk to prompt someone else to WIGO it for me. Enough, I am rambling. Again, I apologise for any accusations against you personally. Tricksy 01:25, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

'Troll'[edit]

I'm afraid I don't live underneath a bridge, but I highly suspect you live in your parents basement. What does that make you? MarcusCicero 21:59, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

You really aren't very good at this. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 03:02, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Yeah that is pretty lame. MC reminds me of jinx. Ace McWickedDisco Jesus 04:26, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Not wrong then ;) MarcusCicero 08:46, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
You used to be better than this. There was a time when an MC post would have this place in upheaval for days! But now, this isn't even CUR-level trolling. Seriously now, did you expect me to be all insulted and scan a copy of my lease? Or perhaps go with the "I'm rubber and you're glue" defense, similar to your comment at the start of this section? Where has that magic gone, MC? I mean, I didn't like you then, but at least you used to be interesting. Now, you're just kinda sad. It's almost pitiable. --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 09:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Its a natural progression. I don't come on here solely to antagonise. Especially at the start I actually cared about the place. I'm not a troll. 86.45.200.112 12:28, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Human WIGO[edit]

I reinstated the WIGO but commented it out. It already had a vote (from the poster I presume) and any new WIGO wouldn't know that this number had already been used. Redchuck.gif ГенгисRationalWiki GOLD member 21:39, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

I thought about commenting it out, but there was only one vote, so I downvoted it to zero it out. I guess it didn't work, though. Thanks! --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 01:39, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

HI CUR!!![edit]

Is that you?

WIGO[edit]

It is getting voted down because it is the third time it has been up there now. - π 14:07, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Okay it does appear to be an update of the previous one, maybe it would be better to present it as such. - π 14:11, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
I didn't write the first one, but if it's a repeat, maybe it should be commented out? I honestly didn't think the whole event was that funny, but I thought I could at least maybe improve the WIGO. Is it even worth updating the previous one? --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 19:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Yes it is an update. From August, look for "Andy proves his complete illiteracy", #2343. AP 02:54, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

Sorry[edit]

Nice catch on that one, guess I wasn't reading as carefully as I should. --Opcn (talk) 06:40, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Don't worry about it. Sorry if I came off a little harsh! --Arcan ¡ollǝɥ 06:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)