User talk:Theonlyconservative

Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, Theonlyconservative. This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives. Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you. If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.

1) No, you're not the only conservative here. 2) Not every reference is a good reference: try to use mainstream media or science references; avoid tabloid/fake news/politically biased references. Bongolian (talk) 06:51, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

1) Don't take my name literally.

2) Define mainstream media/science references, I feel like you'd accept something like CNN, but Fox News, TFP Student Action, or any other site right of center on the political spectrum would be considered fake news.

3) Also, I read the manual. This wiki isn't rational, you call right wing commentators such as Hunter Avallone and even Tucker Carlson jackasses and assholes, and when other users try to make the articles more netural, and therefore rational, by eliminating the name calling their edits are reverted and the people reverting back to the name-calling even admit their bias. Is that what you call rational? A truly rational wiki would be Wikipedia. Theonlyconservative (talk) 15:16, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Two things, first, don't edit other user's comments, that's a big no-no. Second, Bongolian wouldn't have posted the comment above if you hadn't made that exact claim. ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 15:33, 25 April 2018 (UTC)

Also, see: Essay:I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki. Bongolian (talk) 17:01, 25 April 2018 (UTC)