There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
User talk:Truthteller75
Anim (Carfa) 17:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
You guys are liars and nobody cares about your ignorant opinionated sites of biased lies — Unsigned, by: Truthteller75 / talk / contribs
- I'd ban you if I could mate but I'll have to let someone else have that pleasure.. Anim (Carfa)
- Should there be some commas here? 31.51.113.79 (talk) 22:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
As if I REALLY GIVE A FLYING....! You are a loser and so is this site! LIARS WHO KEEP SPREADING LIES. THE TRUTH IS COMING TO LIGHT!— Unsigned, by: Truthteller75 / talk / contribs
- Would you mind attempting to provide some evidence for whatever conspiracy theories you subscribe to? It's always funny. Christopher (talk) 19:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Er, they're not a conspiracist, they're more of the apologist kind of loopy. We get tons of tankies apologists here, and apparently put up with them more than we put up with anti-vaxxer apologists. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 19:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- I would class anti vaxx as part conspiracy, the "suppression of the evidence that vaccines are evil by the establishment" etc. It is slightly different though. Christopher (talk) 20:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
--It's-a me,
LeftyGreenMario! 22:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- You have 'truth' in your name, so you are automatically considered dubious. Not conspiracy but 'a generally recognised truth.' 31.51.113.79 (talk) 22:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- I would class anti vaxx as part conspiracy, the "suppression of the evidence that vaccines are evil by the establishment" etc. It is slightly different though. Christopher (talk) 20:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Er, they're not a conspiracist, they're more of the apologist kind of loopy. We get tons of tankies apologists here, and apparently put up with them more than we put up with anti-vaxxer apologists. ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 19:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)