User talk:Tallyrand

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Tallyrand!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

I am not sure the link dump on your user page fits with RationalWiki's mission. You might want to visit the Saloon Bar, where I have opened a topic about it. CamelCasePragmatist (talk) 15:26, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Spam[edit]

Spam = ads and shit intended to gain profit. Linkspam = annoying and gross, but not ads and shit. Fuzzy. Cat. Potato! (talk/stalk) 16:43, 15 October 2015 (UTC)

Pedanticness = [insert definition here; also see above] ;) 142.124.55.236 (talk) 16:46, 15 October 42015 AQD (UTC)

I am using this page, MY FUCKING PAGE, as a dump junk page for sources I intend to use later. No one is reading it except you fucks, kindly restore MY PAGE to it's former status and add this link at the bottom of my page for me as an apology for you fucking disgraceful, inhospitable, and disgustingly rude behavior: http://www.hawaii.edu/PCSS/biblio/articles/2005to2009/2009-pornography-acceptance-crime.html

This too: http://www.ehbonline.org/article/S1090-5138%2810%2900027-9/fulltext

and this: http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/07/07/social-justice-and-words-words-words/— Unsigned, by: Tallyrand / talk / contribs

Your talk page is not "YOUR FUCKING PAGE" insofar as spam (including linkspam) are not allowed there.--Arisboch ☞✍☜☞✉☜ ∈)☼(∋ 17:51, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

It isn't spam you idiots. It's things I intend to use. It is MY FUCKING PAGE. As you can clearly see. It's not "link spam" you moron, you didn't even bother asking me as to what I was doing, considering I'm new. You're behavior is nothing less than disgusting and deplorable. I'll do it myself and keep YOU and you're REVOLTING BEHAVIOR very, VERY much in mind. — Unsigned, by: Tallyrand / talk / contribs

Use a text file on your desktop. Nobody really needs that many links, anyway. Your eloquent way with words certainly isn't convincing anyone here (and for the record, I was against deleting your page). If you don't have the links anymore, I can send them to you. Carpetsmoker (talk) 17:56, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
"you didn't even bother asking me as to what I was doing"
See above, where, ten minutes after you last touched your user page, I pointed you toward a new discussion of it in the saloon bar. For the lazy, a link... CamelCasePragmatist (talk) 18:26, 19 October 2015 (UTC)