The 2024 Legal Defense Fundraiser has ended early due to the Board's decision to settle the suit. Donations will go towards the creation of a legal defense fund. Discussion on the matter can be found at the RationalMedia Foundation noticeboard. Thank you for your generous support.

Information icon.svg Campaigning is open for the RationalWiki 2024 Board of Trustees election.

Neutralization

From RationalWiki
Revision as of 06:22, 14 July 2020 by King Curtis Kong (talk | contribs) (Filled in more links in the examples and clarified a category)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
RationalWiki's Chilling Tales of True
Crime
Crime icon.png
Articles on illegal behaviour
Busted

Neutralization (often referred to as Techniques of NeutralizationWikipedia) is a psychological process by which an individual justifies personal behavior that contradicts their held values system, without surrendering either the values system in question or their conception of self as one in good standing with it.[1] It is generally structured according to categories first proposed by two of its early proponents: Specifically SykesWikipedia and MatzaWikipedia who in the 1950s set out to observe and describe the process by which "delinquent youths" overcame what SykesWikipedia and MatzaWikipedia theorized to be an otherwise universal inherent shame to the committing of "criminal acts." While this perspective presupposes a number of different ideas about human nature and objective morality that have since come under serious reconsideration (or rejection) by the broader psychological and philosophical communities, the categories themselves retain explainative power within the framework of the theory even when extracted from Sykes and Matza's sloppy editorializing.[1][2]

Sykes' and Matza's Categories

  • Denial of Harm: Self image is maintained through minimizing or denying the consequences of admitted actions.[2] ("It was just a joke." "So I hit him, it's not like I shot him." "That didn't hurt and you know it.")
  • Reflexive Blame: Self image is maintained through casting accusations back at the accusers from a position of denial, claiming instead to be the innocent victim of their aggression, or discounting their aspersions on the basis of their unrelated "guilt."[2] ("You disrespected me first!" "You're a god-hating atheist! I don't need to listen to your words!")

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 "Neutralization Theory" by Heith Copes (2015) DOI: 10.1093/obo/9780195396607-0140 https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780195396607/obo-9780195396607-0140.xml
  2. 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 "Techniques of Neutralization" by Bradley Wright (2008) https://www.everydaysociologyblog.com/2008/10/techniques-of-n.html

See also