Information icon.svg

Nominations for the RationalMedia Foundation 2019 board of trustees election are now open!

Corporal punishment

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
In the name of the
Icon law.svg
To punish
and protect
Were you looking for super crazy fun time?

Corporal punishment is the use of violence, specifically pain, as a form of punishment. Usually this involves striking an offender in some way.

Corporal punishment has been widely used throughout history by many governments, as well as schools, armies, navies, employers and parents. It remains common to many societies, although the laws restricting it differ widely.

Corporal punishment is controversial because in a free, just and modern society, dealing with people through violent means does not square with the notion of inviolable human rights. There is also considerable debate over its effectiveness, and the long-term physical and psychological effects it can have, especially on children.

Child disciplinary issues[edit]

Notwithstanding the expected exception, most Western democracies have outlawed corporal punishment in schools and 36 countries worldwide have banned it in the home as well.[1] In the UK, where some corporal punishment in the home is still legal, a survey suggested that a majority of parents supported the right to smack their children, although a minority understood the legal situation.[2]

Some parents claimed that smacking a child provided a shock to them that remedied bad behaviour, but this must be balanced with the possible problem that a child grows up to believe that violence is a way to solve disputes. There's no clear consensus on this, and there is obviously a difference between an occasional light smack and beating a child on a regular basis.[3] Proponents have also used the argument that they were hit as a child, yet "turned out fine", a rather fallacious argument. A child being disciplined by corporal punishment may grow up believing that it is the right of a parent to be able to hit their children.[4] The context in which the punishment takes place is also important, since the parent's punishment may be more influenced by their own emotional state[5] rather than a rational determination of the action necessary to correct the behaviour of a child. It's a bit like allowing a judge to preside over a court case (and act as the jury) in which the defendant is on trial for punching the judge shortly before the trial began. It's difficult to guarantee an impartial appraisal of the case.

This form of punishment is not any more effective, or even as effective as other forms of discipline[5] but has many more drawbacks.[5] Spanking is a risk factor for other more harsh forms of physical abuse.[4][5] It can also paradoxically lead to worse behavioral problems as a reaction to the punishment. This raises the question of why a parent would risk using corporal punishment rather than practice with other forms of discipline. One reason may be the lack of self control and the ability to stay calm, as parents who corporally punish their children often do so out of anger.[5]

Most pro-spanking material is based on anecdotes[4] and one badly done positive study.[4]

Corporal punishment in American schools[edit]

Almost twenty American states allow corporal punishment, and, in the 2005-2006 school year, about a quarter million American children were subjected to corporal punishment.[6][7]

See also[edit]